Evaluation of Attitudes Towards Gender Roles And Women's Working of Woman Health Professionals

Hacer Alan Dikmen, K. Marakoğlu, Kadriye Mertcan
{"title":"Evaluation of Attitudes Towards Gender Roles And Women's Working of Woman Health Professionals","authors":"Hacer Alan Dikmen, K. Marakoğlu, Kadriye Mertcan","doi":"10.33880/EJFM.2019080105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the women health profession gender roles and attitudes towards women's work.\n\nMethods: This descriptive study was carried out with 351 female employees, including female academicians and nurses at the Medicine and Health Sciences Faculties of Selçuk University. The data were collected by using a data collection form for female academic staff and nurses, The Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working Scale and The Gender Role Attitudes Scale between September 2017 and March 2018. The ethical approval was obtained from the Faculty of Medicine of Selcuk University for this study.\n\nResults: The mean age of the participants was 29,97±7,52; the mean working time was 4,60±7,49; 59,8% of them (210 participants) were nurses; 40,2% of them (141 participants) were academicians. 72,6% of the participants had difficulties in their working life, 61,8% of them stated that their working life had a negative effect on their private life. In our study, the mean of Gender Roles Attitudesscore was 137,14±27,19 (min-max: 38-190) and the meanof Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working Scale score was 53,42±8,62 (min-max: 15-75). The mean of Gender Roles Attitudesscore of the nurses was statistically significantly higher than the mean of Gender Roles Attitudesscore of the academicians (p<0,05). The mean of Attitudes Towards Woman’s Workingscore of the nurses was statistically significantly lower than the mean of Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working score of the academicians (p<0,05). It was found that there was a significant (p<0,001) and weak (rs= -0,208), negative correlation between The Gender Roles Attitudes and The Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working scores. \n\nConclusion: In this study, it was determined that the nurses and academicians had \"positive attitudes\" towards moderate gender roles and working of women.","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/EJFM.2019080105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the women health profession gender roles and attitudes towards women's work. Methods: This descriptive study was carried out with 351 female employees, including female academicians and nurses at the Medicine and Health Sciences Faculties of Selçuk University. The data were collected by using a data collection form for female academic staff and nurses, The Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working Scale and The Gender Role Attitudes Scale between September 2017 and March 2018. The ethical approval was obtained from the Faculty of Medicine of Selcuk University for this study. Results: The mean age of the participants was 29,97±7,52; the mean working time was 4,60±7,49; 59,8% of them (210 participants) were nurses; 40,2% of them (141 participants) were academicians. 72,6% of the participants had difficulties in their working life, 61,8% of them stated that their working life had a negative effect on their private life. In our study, the mean of Gender Roles Attitudesscore was 137,14±27,19 (min-max: 38-190) and the meanof Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working Scale score was 53,42±8,62 (min-max: 15-75). The mean of Gender Roles Attitudesscore of the nurses was statistically significantly higher than the mean of Gender Roles Attitudesscore of the academicians (p<0,05). The mean of Attitudes Towards Woman’s Workingscore of the nurses was statistically significantly lower than the mean of Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working score of the academicians (p<0,05). It was found that there was a significant (p<0,001) and weak (rs= -0,208), negative correlation between The Gender Roles Attitudes and The Attitudes Towards Woman’s Working scores. Conclusion: In this study, it was determined that the nurses and academicians had "positive attitudes" towards moderate gender roles and working of women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价妇女保健专业人员对性别角色和妇女工作的态度
目的:本研究的目的是评价妇女保健职业的性别角色和对妇女工作的态度。方法:对塞尔帕鲁克大学医学与健康科学学院的女院士和女护士等351名女性员工进行描述性研究。2017年9月至2018年3月期间,数据通过女性学术人员和护士数据收集表、女性工作态度量表和性别角色态度量表收集。本研究获得了Selcuk大学医学院的伦理批准。结果:参与者平均年龄为29.97±7.52岁;平均工作时间为4.60±7.49;其中护士占59.8%(210名);其中40.2%(141名参与者)是院士。72.6%的受访者在工作生活中遇到困难,61.8%的受访者表示他们的工作生活对他们的私人生活产生了负面影响。性别角色态度得分均值为137,14±27,19分(最小-最大值为38 ~ 190分),女性工作态度得分均值为53,42±8,62分(最小-最大值为15 ~ 75分)。护士性别角色态度的平均值高于院士性别角色态度的平均值(p< 0.05)。护士的女性工作态度得分均值低于院士的女性工作态度得分均值,差异有统计学意义(p< 0.05)。性别角色态度与女性工作态度得分之间存在显著(p< 0.001)和弱(rs= -0,208)负相关。结论:本研究确定护士和院士对适度的性别角色和女性工作持“积极态度”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Three Methods, “Pap Smear, Conization and LEEP” in Women with Abnormal Pap Smear: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analytical Study Evaluation of Misbeliefs, Myths and Knowledge About Nevi and Skin Cancer in Dermatology Patients Breastfeeding Problems of Mothers in the Postpartum Period and Impact on Sleep Quality The Relationship of Pain Sensitivity and Severity with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain The Relationship Between Parents’ Health Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1