Glycemic Control Among Type 2 Diabetics: Comparison of Patients Coming to Specialized Clinics vs General Clinics for Diabetes

Khawar Qureshi, S. Danish, F. Ahmed
{"title":"Glycemic Control Among Type 2 Diabetics: Comparison of Patients Coming to Specialized Clinics vs General Clinics for Diabetes","authors":"Khawar Qureshi, S. Danish, F. Ahmed","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs22169987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the difference of glycemic control (Mean HBA1c) between patients consulting at specialized Diabetic clinic and those coming to usual general practices. Study Design: Quasi Experimental study Place and Duration: OPDs of general Practice clinics and Outpatient department of a specialized diabetes clinic at Sialkot for 3 months. Methodology: Total n=250 patients were inducted using consecutive sampling technique carried for 3 months. The sample was divided into two groups “Diabetes Specialist clinics” (n=125) and with traditional setup without a team approach as “general practice clinics” (n=125).In this study patients included were of both gender with age group comprising > 40 years and history of T2Dm for at least one year. Type1 dm, gestational diabetes and those without signing consent were excluded. Data was collected using structured questionnaire by primary investigator after informed consent and at the end of three months the difference of means of HBa1c of two different groups. Analysis was done on SPSS version 22 using independent sample t-test. Mean and standard deviation were taken for numerical data, while for categorical data, percentages and frequency were taken out. Statistically significant p value was viewed as < 0.05. Results: When Independent T Test was applied, in specialist clinic HBA1c was 8.51±1.23 whereas in General practice clinic it was 9.57±1.62 with statistically significant difference (p value 0.000). When ANOVA applied to see differences in HBA1c among those with primary, secondary, Intermediate and graduate level education, statistically insignificant results were found (p value 0.373). Likewise, when compared by duration of diabetes, statistically insignificant results were found (p value 0.379). Results were statistically insignificant (p value 0.95), when compared based on rural and urban residence. Conclusion: The study shows statistically significant difference in glycemic control (HBA1c) levels between those coming to general practice clinics and those consulting at specialized diabetic clinics. Keywords: Diabetes, Diabetes Specialist clinic, HbA1C","PeriodicalId":296492,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp; Health Sciences","volume":"os-54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp; Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22169987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the difference of glycemic control (Mean HBA1c) between patients consulting at specialized Diabetic clinic and those coming to usual general practices. Study Design: Quasi Experimental study Place and Duration: OPDs of general Practice clinics and Outpatient department of a specialized diabetes clinic at Sialkot for 3 months. Methodology: Total n=250 patients were inducted using consecutive sampling technique carried for 3 months. The sample was divided into two groups “Diabetes Specialist clinics” (n=125) and with traditional setup without a team approach as “general practice clinics” (n=125).In this study patients included were of both gender with age group comprising > 40 years and history of T2Dm for at least one year. Type1 dm, gestational diabetes and those without signing consent were excluded. Data was collected using structured questionnaire by primary investigator after informed consent and at the end of three months the difference of means of HBa1c of two different groups. Analysis was done on SPSS version 22 using independent sample t-test. Mean and standard deviation were taken for numerical data, while for categorical data, percentages and frequency were taken out. Statistically significant p value was viewed as < 0.05. Results: When Independent T Test was applied, in specialist clinic HBA1c was 8.51±1.23 whereas in General practice clinic it was 9.57±1.62 with statistically significant difference (p value 0.000). When ANOVA applied to see differences in HBA1c among those with primary, secondary, Intermediate and graduate level education, statistically insignificant results were found (p value 0.373). Likewise, when compared by duration of diabetes, statistically insignificant results were found (p value 0.379). Results were statistically insignificant (p value 0.95), when compared based on rural and urban residence. Conclusion: The study shows statistically significant difference in glycemic control (HBA1c) levels between those coming to general practice clinics and those consulting at specialized diabetic clinics. Keywords: Diabetes, Diabetes Specialist clinic, HbA1C
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:糖尿病专科诊所与普通诊所患者的比较
目的:分析糖尿病专科门诊就诊患者与普通全科就诊患者血糖控制(平均HBA1c)的差异。研究设计:准实验研究地点和时间:在Sialkot的全科诊所和糖尿病专科诊所的门诊部工作3个月。方法:采用连续抽样法,共纳入250例患者,随访3个月。样本被分为两组:“糖尿病专科诊所”(n=125)和传统设置不采用团队方法的“全科诊所”(n=125)。本研究纳入的患者男女皆可,年龄≥40岁,2型糖尿病病史至少一年。1型糖尿病、妊娠期糖尿病及未签署同意书者排除在外。经知情同意后,由主要研究者采用结构化问卷收集数据,3个月结束时两组HBa1c均值的差异。采用SPSS version 22独立样本t检验进行分析。数值数据取均值和标准差,分类数据取百分比和频率。p值< 0.05,差异有统计学意义。结果:经独立T检验,专科门诊HBA1c为8.51±1.23,全科门诊为9.57±1.62,差异有统计学意义(p值0.000)。应用方差分析分析小学、中学、中级、研究生学历人群HBA1c差异,p值0.373,差异无统计学意义。同样,当比较糖尿病持续时间时,发现统计学上不显著的结果(p值0.379)。当以农村和城市居民为基础进行比较时,结果具有统计学意义(p值0.95)。结论:该研究显示,在全科诊所就诊的患者与在糖尿病专科诊所就诊的患者之间,血糖控制(HBA1c)水平有统计学上的显著差异。关键词:糖尿病,糖尿病专科门诊,糖化血红蛋白
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Audit of Injuries Sustained in Two–Wheeler Accidents in the Metropolitan City of Karachi, Pakistan Real World Data about the Characteristics of Adult Diabetes Mellitus Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy of Oral Midazolam in Post Operative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Effect of Low Dose (100mg/kg) of Zinc Telluride (ZnTe) on Hematology of Male Albino Mice (Mus musculus) Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Typhidot Test Against Blood Culture in Diagnosis of Enteric Fever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1