Heidegger on Rhetoric: An Existential Deconstruction of the Notion of Communication

D. Pandiaraj
{"title":"Heidegger on Rhetoric: An Existential Deconstruction of the Notion of Communication","authors":"D. Pandiaraj","doi":"10.12726/TJP.21.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to show how Martin Heidegger’s phenomenological interpretation of Aristotle’s theory of rhetoric can be interpreted usefully to understand the existential dimension of communication. Heidegger’s treatment of communication as a phenomenon is ontologically broader as he locates it within the existential analytics of Dasein. Taking Heidegger’s 1924 Marburg lecture, Being and Time and other texts dealing with the problem of the being of language as theoretical sources, this study first presents the importance of Heidegger’s conception of rhetoric and then shows how this throws light on the ontological aspects of communication as such. Human beings in their basic mode of existence as being-in-the-world and speaking-with-one-another is always already in communication through language. If rhetoric is a way of having the existential view about how matters present themselves in a particular manner by virtue of speaking about it with-one-another, then it is in the region of the doxa of people. Further, how existential communication works in our concrete life is demonstrated through a rhetorical analysis of the film Blow-Up.","PeriodicalId":279219,"journal":{"name":"Tattva - Journal of Philosophy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tattva - Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12726/TJP.21.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper attempts to show how Martin Heidegger’s phenomenological interpretation of Aristotle’s theory of rhetoric can be interpreted usefully to understand the existential dimension of communication. Heidegger’s treatment of communication as a phenomenon is ontologically broader as he locates it within the existential analytics of Dasein. Taking Heidegger’s 1924 Marburg lecture, Being and Time and other texts dealing with the problem of the being of language as theoretical sources, this study first presents the importance of Heidegger’s conception of rhetoric and then shows how this throws light on the ontological aspects of communication as such. Human beings in their basic mode of existence as being-in-the-world and speaking-with-one-another is always already in communication through language. If rhetoric is a way of having the existential view about how matters present themselves in a particular manner by virtue of speaking about it with-one-another, then it is in the region of the doxa of people. Further, how existential communication works in our concrete life is demonstrated through a rhetorical analysis of the film Blow-Up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海德格尔论修辞学:对传播概念的存在主义解构
本文试图说明海德格尔对亚里士多德修辞学理论的现象学解释如何有助于理解交际的存在维度。海德格尔将交流作为一种现象的处理在本体论上更为广泛,因为他将其置于存在分析的此在之中。本研究以海德格尔1924年在马尔堡的演讲《存在与时间》和其他讨论语言存在问题的文本为理论来源,首先提出了海德格尔修辞学概念的重要性,然后展示了这一概念如何为交流的本体论方面带来启示。人类以“存在于世”和“彼此交谈”的基本生存方式,总是通过语言进行交流。如果修辞学是一种关于事物如何以一种特定的方式呈现的存在主义观点,通过彼此之间的讨论,那么它就属于人类的范畴。此外,通过对电影《放大》的修辞分析,展示了存在主义沟通如何在我们的具体生活中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hard, Harder, and the Hardest Problem: The Society of Cognitive Selves Fundamentality and Conditionality of Existence Monism and Pluralism – A Conceptual Analysis of Their Mutual Interactions within Discourses on Religion Critiquing Critique Knowledge and Action in Non-Dualistic Vedānta: The Incongruity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1