An Explorative Analysis of the Notational Characteristics of the Decision Model and Notation (DMN)

Zhivka Dangarska, K. Figl, J. Mendling
{"title":"An Explorative Analysis of the Notational Characteristics of the Decision Model and Notation (DMN)","authors":"Zhivka Dangarska, K. Figl, J. Mendling","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision models are usually created to complement business process models and to separate them from additional information regarding the decision-making. Like other conceptual models, their purpose is to exceed the representing capabilities of a textual information representation by providing human readers a more visually expressive and cognitively effective form of representation, and if applicable, to allow for future automation. This paper presents findings from a cognitive analysis on the conformity of the newly specified DMN standard notation with principles for effective visual design. While the principle of semiotic clarity and visual expressiveness appeared to be mostly satisfied, visual expressiveness and perceptual discriminability were perceived as partly violated. It was assumed that the DMN notation satisfies the principles of complexity management and cognitive integration. The goal of this first qualitative analysis is to lay the foundation for follow-up, empirical investigations to investigate these ratings.","PeriodicalId":287808,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Decision models are usually created to complement business process models and to separate them from additional information regarding the decision-making. Like other conceptual models, their purpose is to exceed the representing capabilities of a textual information representation by providing human readers a more visually expressive and cognitively effective form of representation, and if applicable, to allow for future automation. This paper presents findings from a cognitive analysis on the conformity of the newly specified DMN standard notation with principles for effective visual design. While the principle of semiotic clarity and visual expressiveness appeared to be mostly satisfied, visual expressiveness and perceptual discriminability were perceived as partly violated. It was assumed that the DMN notation satisfies the principles of complexity management and cognitive integration. The goal of this first qualitative analysis is to lay the foundation for follow-up, empirical investigations to investigate these ratings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策模型与符号(DMN)符号特征的探索性分析
通常创建决策模型是为了补充业务流程模型,并将它们与有关决策的其他信息分开。与其他概念模型一样,它们的目的是通过为人类读者提供一种更具视觉表现力和认知有效性的表示形式,从而超越文本信息表示的表示能力,如果适用的话,还可以实现未来的自动化。本文对新规定的DMN标准符号与有效视觉设计原则的符合性进行了认知分析。虽然符号清晰性和视觉表现力原则似乎大部分得到满足,但视觉表现力和知觉可辨别性原则被认为部分违反。假设DMN符号满足复杂性管理和认知整合的原则。第一次定性分析的目的是为后续的实证调查奠定基础,以调查这些评级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Artifact-Centric Business Process Execution Platform Untangling EA's Long Path of Becoming a Partner for Business Transformation: The Case of Swiss Federal Railways Social Set Visualizer (SoSeVi) II: Interactive Computational Set Analysis of Big Social Data Automated Change Planning for Differential Update IT Systems with State Constraint Message from the CeSCop/ProMoS 2016 Workshop Chairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1