Comparison Study of Bacterial Profile, Wound Healing, and Cost Effectiveness in Pressure Injury Patients Using Treatment Honey Dressing and Hydrogel

Nandita Melati Putri, Ruth Fitri Margareta Lumbuun, P. Kreshanti, Y. Saharman, Narottama Tunjung
{"title":"Comparison Study of Bacterial Profile, Wound Healing, and Cost Effectiveness in Pressure Injury Patients Using Treatment Honey Dressing and Hydrogel","authors":"Nandita Melati Putri, Ruth Fitri Margareta Lumbuun, P. Kreshanti, Y. Saharman, Narottama Tunjung","doi":"10.14228/jprjournal.v9i1.334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Pressure injury is a localized soft tissue injury caused by prolonged pressure over bony prominence. Most published papers used Manuka honey as dressing, while this product is expensive. As this reason, this study will use local product honey called Nusantara honey, to prove the use of local honey has better healing process, bacterial profile, and cost effectiveness, compared to the standard dressing, hydrogel.Method : This is a one-month experimental study conducted in patients with pressure injury that referred to our division. Parameter of the bacterial profile was taken from deep-tissue specimen. The healing process was examined with Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) Tool. Cost was accumulated after all the treatment. Data was analysed with t-Test or Mann Whitney (if the distribution is not normal), with statistical significance was define as p<0.05..Result : Of 26 wounds, 12 were randomized to hydrogel and 14 to honey dressing. Characteristics were determined by sex, age, body mass index, level of consciousness, mobilization status, immobilization etiology, comorbidities, grade and location of ulcer, hemoglobin, leukocytes, and albumin level. There was clinically significant wound size reduction in honey dressing according to PUSH Tool (p=0.118). The bacterial profile and reduction were similar. Honey dressing appeared to be more cost effective in terms of dressing cost (p<0.001) and lower total cost.Conclusion: The local honey dressing has better wound healing outcome, although it is not statistically significant. Its capability of decreasing pathogens is similar with hydrogel, with lower cost, particularly the dressing cost. This local honey dressing could be a good choice as wound dressing in areas where the modern dressings are not available.","PeriodicalId":364477,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14228/jprjournal.v9i1.334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background : Pressure injury is a localized soft tissue injury caused by prolonged pressure over bony prominence. Most published papers used Manuka honey as dressing, while this product is expensive. As this reason, this study will use local product honey called Nusantara honey, to prove the use of local honey has better healing process, bacterial profile, and cost effectiveness, compared to the standard dressing, hydrogel.Method : This is a one-month experimental study conducted in patients with pressure injury that referred to our division. Parameter of the bacterial profile was taken from deep-tissue specimen. The healing process was examined with Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) Tool. Cost was accumulated after all the treatment. Data was analysed with t-Test or Mann Whitney (if the distribution is not normal), with statistical significance was define as p<0.05..Result : Of 26 wounds, 12 were randomized to hydrogel and 14 to honey dressing. Characteristics were determined by sex, age, body mass index, level of consciousness, mobilization status, immobilization etiology, comorbidities, grade and location of ulcer, hemoglobin, leukocytes, and albumin level. There was clinically significant wound size reduction in honey dressing according to PUSH Tool (p=0.118). The bacterial profile and reduction were similar. Honey dressing appeared to be more cost effective in terms of dressing cost (p<0.001) and lower total cost.Conclusion: The local honey dressing has better wound healing outcome, although it is not statistically significant. Its capability of decreasing pathogens is similar with hydrogel, with lower cost, particularly the dressing cost. This local honey dressing could be a good choice as wound dressing in areas where the modern dressings are not available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜂蜜敷料和水凝胶治疗压伤患者的细菌分布、伤口愈合和成本效益的比较研究
背景:压迫性损伤是一种局部软组织损伤,是由于长时间压迫骨突引起的。大多数发表的论文使用麦卢卡蜂蜜作为敷料,而这种产品是昂贵的。因此,本研究将使用当地生产的蜂蜜Nusantara蜂蜜,以证明与标准敷料水凝胶相比,使用当地蜂蜜具有更好的愈合过程,细菌特征和成本效益。方法:这是一项为期一个月的实验研究,在病人的压力损伤,转介到我科。细菌剖面参数取自深层组织标本。用压疮愈合量表(PUSH)工具检查愈合过程。费用是在所有治疗后积累起来的。数据采用t检验或Mann Whitney检验(非正态分布),以p<0.05定义有统计学意义。结果:26例创面中,水凝胶组12例,蜂蜜敷料组14例。特征由性别、年龄、体重指数、意识水平、活动状态、固定病因、合并症、溃疡的等级和位置、血红蛋白、白细胞和白蛋白水平决定。根据PUSH Tool,蜂蜜敷料可显著减少创面大小(p=0.118)。细菌谱和还原是相似的。蜂蜜敷料在敷料成本方面更具成本效益(p<0.001),总成本更低。结论:局部蜂蜜敷料具有较好的创面愈合效果,但差异无统计学意义。其降低致病菌的能力与水凝胶相似,成本更低,特别是敷料成本更低。在没有现代敷料的地区,这种当地的蜂蜜敷料可以作为伤口敷料的好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE DOCUMENTATION OF CLEFT LIP AND PALATE PATIENTS AT THE DEWI SARTIKA HOSPITAL IN KENDARI THE ACCEPTABILITY OF TELEMEDICINE IN POST-MASS CHARITY CIRCUMCISION IN INDONESIA: A PILOT STUDY THE EFFECT OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED COENZYME Q10 ON THE VIABILITY OF RANDOM SKIN FLAP IN NICOTINE EXPOSED WISTAR RATS POST OPERATIVE PALATOPLASTY FEEDING GUIDELINES: A LITERATURE REVIEW FLAP MODALITY FOR RESURFACING FOLLOWING EXTERNAL GENITALIA TUMOR ABLATION: A CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1