The influence of specific training load on the level of reactive and planned agility in floorball

Ľ. Paška, P. Horička, J. Šimonek, J. Krajčovič, G. Liptáková
{"title":"The influence of specific training load on the level of reactive and planned agility in floorball","authors":"Ľ. Paška, P. Horička, J. Šimonek, J. Krajčovič, G. Liptáková","doi":"10.32725/sk.2023.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of our research was to verify the impact of the selected training means of training load in the interval of 10 weeks during the competition period in the season 2021/2022 and to diagnose changes in selected indicators of reactive and planned agility in the senior extra-league woman team of floorball players in the club VŠK PdF UK Hurikán Bratislava. The research group consisted of woman floorball players (n = 12, aged 22,6 ± 1,6). Motor indicators consisted of reactive agility tests (Y-Agility test, modified Fitro Agility Check-test) and running agility (T-Agility test). For more accurate measurement, we used Mircrogate photocells, the Witty Sem Microgate signalling light device. The result of our work was the detection of statistically significant changes in the differences at the 5% and 10% level of significance, which we noted due to the influence of selected means of training load. In the indicators of reactive agility in the Y-Agility test, we reached a statistically significant P-value (0.054) at the 10% level of significance. In the Fitro Agility Check test, we recorded a statistically significant P - value (0.071) at the 10% level of significance. In the T-test indicator of planned agility, we found a P-value (0.934), which did not correspond to any of the monitored levels of significance. We confirmed that in our monitored team of woman floorball players the level of reactive agility in the Y-agility and Fitro Agility Check tests was higher, also confirmed by statistical level of significance. On the contrary, we did not found a significant increase in the level of planned agility test and no statistical significance was confirmed. We recommend regularly working on increasing the level of reactive agility in team sports in all age categories. Acknowledgements: The contribution was realized as a part of the grant project VEGA 1/0313/22 – Identification of reactive agility factors in team sports.","PeriodicalId":179970,"journal":{"name":"Studia Kinanthropologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Kinanthropologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/sk.2023.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our research was to verify the impact of the selected training means of training load in the interval of 10 weeks during the competition period in the season 2021/2022 and to diagnose changes in selected indicators of reactive and planned agility in the senior extra-league woman team of floorball players in the club VŠK PdF UK Hurikán Bratislava. The research group consisted of woman floorball players (n = 12, aged 22,6 ± 1,6). Motor indicators consisted of reactive agility tests (Y-Agility test, modified Fitro Agility Check-test) and running agility (T-Agility test). For more accurate measurement, we used Mircrogate photocells, the Witty Sem Microgate signalling light device. The result of our work was the detection of statistically significant changes in the differences at the 5% and 10% level of significance, which we noted due to the influence of selected means of training load. In the indicators of reactive agility in the Y-Agility test, we reached a statistically significant P-value (0.054) at the 10% level of significance. In the Fitro Agility Check test, we recorded a statistically significant P - value (0.071) at the 10% level of significance. In the T-test indicator of planned agility, we found a P-value (0.934), which did not correspond to any of the monitored levels of significance. We confirmed that in our monitored team of woman floorball players the level of reactive agility in the Y-agility and Fitro Agility Check tests was higher, also confirmed by statistical level of significance. On the contrary, we did not found a significant increase in the level of planned agility test and no statistical significance was confirmed. We recommend regularly working on increasing the level of reactive agility in team sports in all age categories. Acknowledgements: The contribution was realized as a part of the grant project VEGA 1/0313/22 – Identification of reactive agility factors in team sports.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特定训练负荷对地面球运动反应性和计划敏捷性水平的影响
本研究的目的是验证2021/2022赛季比赛期间10周训练负荷选择训练方式的影响,并诊断布拉迪斯拉发俱乐部(VŠK PdF UK Hurikán布拉迪斯拉发)高级联赛女队地板运动员反应性和计划敏捷性选择指标的变化。研究对象为女子地球运动员(n = 12,年龄22,6±1,6)。电机指标包括反应敏捷性测试(y敏捷测试,改进的Fitro敏捷性检查测试)和运行敏捷性测试(t敏捷测试)。为了更精确的测量,我们使用了微门光电池,即Witty Sem微门信号光装置。我们的工作结果是在5%和10%的显著性水平上发现了统计学上显著的变化,我们注意到这是由于所选择的训练负荷手段的影响。在Y-Agility检验的反应敏捷性指标中,我们在10%的显著性水平上达到了具有统计学意义的p值(0.054)。在Fitro敏捷性检验中,我们在10%的显著性水平上记录了统计学显著的P值(0.071)。在计划敏捷性的t检验指标中,我们发现p值(0.934)不对应于任何监测的显著性水平。我们证实了我们监测的女子地板运动员在y敏捷性和Fitro敏捷性检查中的反应敏捷性水平更高,并通过统计显著性水平证实。相反,我们没有发现计划敏捷性测试水平有显著提高,也没有统计学意义得到证实。我们建议在所有年龄段的团队运动中定期提高反应敏捷性的水平。致谢:该贡献是作为资助项目VEGA 1/0313/22的一部分实现的——团队运动中反应性敏捷性因素的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Muscle imbalance and hypermobility in figure skaters of younger school age Self-talk and its application to competitive swimming The relative age effect in Czech orienteering runners Benefits of sport participation for athletes with intellectual impairment Muscle imbalance and hypermobility in figure skaters of younger school age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1