An analysis of the interplay between affective and cognitive components of teacher identity among native and non-native EFL in-service trainees

Haticetül Kübra Er, Emel Küçükali
{"title":"An analysis of the interplay between affective and cognitive components of teacher identity among native and non-native EFL in-service trainees","authors":"Haticetül Kübra Er, Emel Küçükali","doi":"10.36534/erlj.2023.01.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to explore the affective and cognitive components teacher identity by examining the EFL teachers’ and in-service trainers’ attitudes toward in-service professional development training process at a private university in Turkey. The participants, who were selected through convenient sampling, consist of native and non-native EFL instructors; EFL in-service trainees (N=6) and teacher trainers; EFL in-service teacher trainers (N=2). The data was collected via semi-structured interviews conducted with the teachers and Behavior Observation Rubric completed by teacher trainers. In the first phase, EFL teacher trainees were observed in class and given post observation feedback by in-service teacher trainers, who completed the rubric evaluating the reactions of the teachers to four categories: (1) Attitude to feedback, (2) Response to feedback, (3) Behavior, and (4) Independent work. In the second phase, teachers were interviewed about their perceptions of the in-service training process; Interview data (qualitative data) were analyzed through content analysis, while descriptive statistics (frequency) was used to analyze Behavior Observation Rubric scores (quantitative data). The findings indicated differences between native and non-native EFL instructors (trainees). According to interviews, native EFL instructors felt more enthusiastic about professional development sessions compared to non-native EFL teachers due to several educational background, cultural differences and so on. This was supported by the results from the Behavior Observation Rubric, which revealed higher scores for native EFL instructors than for non-native instructors in terms of attitude to feedback, response to feedback, behavior, and independent work during the professional development; observation process. / Keywords: native vs. non-native EFL instructors, teacher identity, EFL in-service trainees","PeriodicalId":270557,"journal":{"name":"Educational Role of Language Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Role of Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36534/erlj.2023.01.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to explore the affective and cognitive components teacher identity by examining the EFL teachers’ and in-service trainers’ attitudes toward in-service professional development training process at a private university in Turkey. The participants, who were selected through convenient sampling, consist of native and non-native EFL instructors; EFL in-service trainees (N=6) and teacher trainers; EFL in-service teacher trainers (N=2). The data was collected via semi-structured interviews conducted with the teachers and Behavior Observation Rubric completed by teacher trainers. In the first phase, EFL teacher trainees were observed in class and given post observation feedback by in-service teacher trainers, who completed the rubric evaluating the reactions of the teachers to four categories: (1) Attitude to feedback, (2) Response to feedback, (3) Behavior, and (4) Independent work. In the second phase, teachers were interviewed about their perceptions of the in-service training process; Interview data (qualitative data) were analyzed through content analysis, while descriptive statistics (frequency) was used to analyze Behavior Observation Rubric scores (quantitative data). The findings indicated differences between native and non-native EFL instructors (trainees). According to interviews, native EFL instructors felt more enthusiastic about professional development sessions compared to non-native EFL teachers due to several educational background, cultural differences and so on. This was supported by the results from the Behavior Observation Rubric, which revealed higher scores for native EFL instructors than for non-native instructors in terms of attitude to feedback, response to feedback, behavior, and independent work during the professional development; observation process. / Keywords: native vs. non-native EFL instructors, teacher identity, EFL in-service trainees
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母语和非母语在职学员教师认同的情感和认知成分的相互作用分析
本研究旨在通过调查土耳其一所私立大学的英语教师和在职培训师对在职专业发展培训过程的态度,探讨教师认同的情感和认知成分。参与者通过方便的抽样选择,包括母语和非母语英语教师;英语在职培训生(N=6)和教师培训师;英语在职教师培训师(N=2)。数据是通过对教师进行的半结构化访谈和由教师培训者完成的行为观察表收集的。在第一阶段,在职教师培训师在课堂上对英语培训教师进行观察,并给予观察后的反馈,他们完成了评估教师对四个方面的反应的量表:(1)对反馈的态度,(2)对反馈的反应,(3)行为,(4)独立工作。在第二阶段,对教师进行采访,了解他们对在职培训过程的看法;访谈数据(定性数据)通过内容分析进行分析,行为观察评分(定量数据)采用描述性统计(频率)进行分析。研究结果表明母语和非母语英语教师(学员)之间存在差异。根据访谈,由于教育背景、文化差异等原因,母语教师比非母语教师对专业发展课程更有热情。行为观察量表的结果也支持了这一观点,该量表显示,在对反馈的态度、对反馈的反应、行为和专业发展中的独立工作方面,母语教师的得分高于非母语教师;观察的过程。关键词:母语与非母语教师教师身份在职学员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Affect behind the use of anglicisms among adolescents in North Macedonia - causes and consequences Emotions, orientations and intentions for linguistic variations: Guide for language teaching - a report Emotions in language learning and use - 6th International pedagogical and linguistic conference, Ulm University, Germany Emotions in Norwegian language debate Incorporating literature in EFL classroom: attitudes and experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1