Socio-PLT: principles for programming language adoption

Leo A. Meyerovich, A. Rabkin
{"title":"Socio-PLT: principles for programming language adoption","authors":"Leo A. Meyerovich, A. Rabkin","doi":"10.1145/2384592.2384597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do some programming languages fail and others succeed? What does the answer tell us about programming language design, implementation, and principles? To help answer these and other questions, we argue for examining the sociological groundings of programming language theory: socio-PLT.\n Researchers in the social sciences have studied adoption in many contexts. We show how their findings are applicable to programming language design. For example, many programming language features provide benefits that programmers cannot directly or immediately observe and therefore may not find compelling. From clean water to safe sex, the health community has repeatedly identified and surmounted similar observability barriers. We use such results from outside of programming language theory to frame a research agenda that should help us understand the social foundations of languages. Finally, we examine implications of our approach, such as for the design space of language features and the assessment of scientific research into programming languages.","PeriodicalId":168332,"journal":{"name":"SIGPLAN symposium on New ideas, new paradigms, and reflections on programming and software","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGPLAN symposium on New ideas, new paradigms, and reflections on programming and software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2384592.2384597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Why do some programming languages fail and others succeed? What does the answer tell us about programming language design, implementation, and principles? To help answer these and other questions, we argue for examining the sociological groundings of programming language theory: socio-PLT. Researchers in the social sciences have studied adoption in many contexts. We show how their findings are applicable to programming language design. For example, many programming language features provide benefits that programmers cannot directly or immediately observe and therefore may not find compelling. From clean water to safe sex, the health community has repeatedly identified and surmounted similar observability barriers. We use such results from outside of programming language theory to frame a research agenda that should help us understand the social foundations of languages. Finally, we examine implications of our approach, such as for the design space of language features and the assessment of scientific research into programming languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会- plt:编程语言采用的原则
为什么有些编程语言失败了,有些却成功了?关于编程语言的设计、实现和原则,这个答案告诉了我们什么?为了帮助回答这些问题和其他问题,我们主张检查编程语言理论的社会学基础:社会- plt。社会科学领域的研究人员在许多情况下研究了收养问题。我们展示了他们的发现如何适用于编程语言设计。例如,许多编程语言特性提供了程序员无法直接或立即观察到的好处,因此可能不觉得有吸引力。从清洁饮水到安全性行为,卫生界一再发现并克服了类似的可观察性障碍。我们使用这些来自编程语言理论之外的结果来构建一个研究议程,这将有助于我们理解语言的社会基础。最后,我们研究了我们的方法的含义,例如语言特征的设计空间和对编程语言的科学研究的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usable live programming Growing solver-aided languages with rosette User model and system model: the yin and yang in user-centered software development Building connections between theories of computing and physical systems Usable security as a static-analysis problem: modeling and reasoning about user permissions in social-sharing systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1