Utility of Generalized Hazards Model Incorporating Cubic B-spline Function into the Baseline Hazard Function

Hisao Takeuchi, I. Yoshimura, C. Hamada
{"title":"Utility of Generalized Hazards Model Incorporating Cubic B-spline Function into the Baseline Hazard Function","authors":"Hisao Takeuchi, I. Yoshimura, C. Hamada","doi":"10.5691/JJB.27.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A generalized hazards model incorporating a cubic B-spline function into the baseline hazard function (GHMBS) was proposed as a model for estimating covariate effects in survival data analysis. The GHMBS integrated the three types of hazard models: the proportional hazards model (PHM), accelerated failure time model (AFTM), and accelerated hazards model (AHM), which enabled the likelihood principle for estimation and hypothesis testing to be applied irrespective of submodels (i.e., PHM, AFTM, and AHM). A procedure for adaptively choosing suitable knots from a set of candidate knots was proposed in order to actualize an appropriate baseline hazard function in GHMBS. The characteristic of the proposal was evaluated with bias and mean squared error of the estimation of covariate effects through a Monte-Carlo simulation experiment. A method for identifying a submodel appropriate for the data to be analyzed was also proposed based on GHMBS. The performance of the proposed model selection method was evaluated with the probability of selecting the true model through a Monte-Carlo simulation experiment based on PHM and AFTM. As a result, the proposed method achieved fairly high probabilities of identifying the true model. An application of the proposed method to actual data in a clinical trial provided a reasonable conclusion.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.27.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A generalized hazards model incorporating a cubic B-spline function into the baseline hazard function (GHMBS) was proposed as a model for estimating covariate effects in survival data analysis. The GHMBS integrated the three types of hazard models: the proportional hazards model (PHM), accelerated failure time model (AFTM), and accelerated hazards model (AHM), which enabled the likelihood principle for estimation and hypothesis testing to be applied irrespective of submodels (i.e., PHM, AFTM, and AHM). A procedure for adaptively choosing suitable knots from a set of candidate knots was proposed in order to actualize an appropriate baseline hazard function in GHMBS. The characteristic of the proposal was evaluated with bias and mean squared error of the estimation of covariate effects through a Monte-Carlo simulation experiment. A method for identifying a submodel appropriate for the data to be analyzed was also proposed based on GHMBS. The performance of the proposed model selection method was evaluated with the probability of selecting the true model through a Monte-Carlo simulation experiment based on PHM and AFTM. As a result, the proposed method achieved fairly high probabilities of identifying the true model. An application of the proposed method to actual data in a clinical trial provided a reasonable conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将三次b样条函数纳入基线危害函数的广义危害模型的应用
提出了一种将三次b样条函数纳入基线风险函数(GHMBS)的广义风险模型,作为估计生存数据分析中协变量效应的模型。GHMBS综合了比例风险模型(PHM)、加速失效时间模型(AFTM)和加速风险模型(AHM)三种类型的风险模型,使得估计和假设检验的似然原理可以不考虑子模型(PHM、AFTM和AHM)。为了在GHMBS中实现合适的基线危害函数,提出了一种从一组候选节点中自适应选择合适节点的方法。通过蒙特卡罗模拟实验,用协变量效应估计的偏倚和均方误差对该方案的特性进行了评价。在此基础上,提出了一种适合待分析数据的子模型识别方法。通过基于PHM和AFTM的蒙特卡罗仿真实验,以选择真实模型的概率对所提模型选择方法的性能进行了评价。结果表明,所提出的方法具有较高的识别真实模型的概率。将所提出的方法应用于临床试验的实际数据,得出了合理的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis for Time-to-event Outcome Based on Restored Individual Participant Data and Summary Statistics Theoretical Examination and Simulation Study on Analyses for Progression Free Survival as Interval-censored Data がん臨床試験と競合リスク・マルチステートモデル Robust and Interpretable Hazard-based Summary Measures of the Magnitude of the Treatment Effect and Their Inference Procedures Bayesian Ridge Estimators Based on Copula-based Joint Prior Distributions: Cox Regression Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1