Evaluasi Knee Ankle Foot Ortosis Dengan Parameter Spatiotemporal Dan Keseimbangan Pada Pengguna dengan Polio

Fika Trifani, Raden Achmad Candra Putra, Tri Riana Lestari
{"title":"Evaluasi Knee Ankle Foot Ortosis Dengan Parameter Spatiotemporal Dan Keseimbangan Pada Pengguna dengan Polio","authors":"Fika Trifani, Raden Achmad Candra Putra, Tri Riana Lestari","doi":"10.36082/QJK.V12I2.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) tool is commonly described for patients with a history of poliomyelitis and serves to improve gait and prevent degeneration of the knee joint. However, at present the effect of using knee ankle foot orthosis in monoplegia polio patients when walking has never been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to analyze biomechanical adaptation especially in spatiotemporal parameters and stability when the subjects walked with and without KAFO aids. Methods: Fifteen monoplegia subjects with poliomyelitis were tested with two gait analyzes (i.e. with and without KAFO aids). Spatiotemporal parameters were tested using the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) instrument, while stability when running was tested with the Timed up and Go (TUG) test instrument. Data from the spatiotemporal parameters obtained were analyzed using paired T tests, and the McNemar test was used to analyze the stability variables while walking. Both analyzes will analyze differences in parameters tested when subjects are in line with and without KAFO tools. Significant level used is p <0.05. Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in spatiotemporal parameters and stability when subjects walked with and without KAFO aids. This tool increases spatiotemporal parameters and stability when the subject runs using KAFO compared to when they did not use orthosis at all. When the stance phase in the leg is paralysis, hyperextension in the knee and excessive flexion of the knee is reduced, while flexion in the hip joint increases. Walking stability increased in 60% of subjects when they used KAFO when walking. This study found that gait compensation was also reduced when subjects walked using KAFO, and through direct feedback the subject stated that walking using KAFO made them not easily tired and could go further.","PeriodicalId":142778,"journal":{"name":"Quality : Jurnal Kesehatan","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality : Jurnal Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36082/QJK.V12I2.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) tool is commonly described for patients with a history of poliomyelitis and serves to improve gait and prevent degeneration of the knee joint. However, at present the effect of using knee ankle foot orthosis in monoplegia polio patients when walking has never been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to analyze biomechanical adaptation especially in spatiotemporal parameters and stability when the subjects walked with and without KAFO aids. Methods: Fifteen monoplegia subjects with poliomyelitis were tested with two gait analyzes (i.e. with and without KAFO aids). Spatiotemporal parameters were tested using the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) instrument, while stability when running was tested with the Timed up and Go (TUG) test instrument. Data from the spatiotemporal parameters obtained were analyzed using paired T tests, and the McNemar test was used to analyze the stability variables while walking. Both analyzes will analyze differences in parameters tested when subjects are in line with and without KAFO tools. Significant level used is p <0.05. Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in spatiotemporal parameters and stability when subjects walked with and without KAFO aids. This tool increases spatiotemporal parameters and stability when the subject runs using KAFO compared to when they did not use orthosis at all. When the stance phase in the leg is paralysis, hyperextension in the knee and excessive flexion of the knee is reduced, while flexion in the hip joint increases. Walking stability increased in 60% of subjects when they used KAFO when walking. This study found that gait compensation was also reduced when subjects walked using KAFO, and through direct feedback the subject stated that walking using KAFO made them not easily tired and could go further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝-踝-足矫形器(KAFO)工具通常用于有脊髓灰质炎病史的患者,用于改善步态和预防膝关节变性。然而,目前对单瘫脊髓灰质炎患者行走时使用膝踝足矫形器的效果尚无评价。本研究的目的是分析受试者在使用和不使用KAFO辅助行走时的生物力学适应性,特别是时空参数和稳定性。方法:对15例脊髓灰质炎单瘫患者进行两种步态分析(即使用和不使用KAFO辅助)。时空参数测试采用10米步行测试(10MWT),跑步稳定性测试采用拔腿起跑(TUG)测试。获得的时空参数数据采用配对T检验进行分析,行走稳定性变量采用McNemar检验进行分析。这两种分析都将分析受试者在使用和不使用KAFO工具时所测试参数的差异。采用显著性水平p <0.05。结果:实验结果表明,受试者在使用和不使用KAFO辅助行走时,其时空参数和稳定性存在显著差异。与受试者完全不使用矫形器时相比,该工具增加了受试者使用KAFO时的时空参数和稳定性。当腿部站姿阶段为麻痹时,膝关节过伸和膝关节过度屈曲减少,髋关节屈曲增加。行走时使用KAFO时,60%的受试者的行走稳定性增加。本研究发现,受试者使用KAFO行走时,步态补偿也有所减少,并且通过直接反馈,受试者表示使用KAFO行走使他们不容易疲劳,可以走得更远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TEKANAN TEMAN SEBAYA DAN INTENSITAS PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SOSIAL INSTAGRAM TERHADAP GANGGUAN MAKAN PADA REMAJA DI SMP SINGKAWANG DETERMINAN YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN KEJADIAN INFEKSI LUKA SECTIO CAESAREA EFEKTIVITAS PSIKOEDUKASI KESEHATAN TERHADAP SIKAP KERJA PETUGAS PUSKESMAS DI WILAYAH KERJA KABUPATEN SOLOK DEVELOPMENT AND EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL APPLICATION AS THE NEW SYSTEM TO ORGANIZE PRACTICUM MATERIALS AT SCHOOL OF PROSTHETICS ORTHOTICS IN POLYTECHNIC HEALTH SCIENCES JAKARTA I HUBUNGAN KETAHANAN DIRI DAN PERAN TEMAN SEBAYA DENGAN PERILAKU KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI REMAJA DI SMP NEGERI X JAKARTA SELATAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1