ERROR ANALYSIS MADE BY THE FIFTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF SAINT THOMAS IN THEIR ENGLISH COMPOSITIONS

Anna Stasya Prima Sari, Anggiat Sinaga
{"title":"ERROR ANALYSIS MADE BY THE FIFTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF SAINT THOMAS IN THEIR ENGLISH COMPOSITIONS","authors":"Anna Stasya Prima Sari, Anggiat Sinaga","doi":"10.36655/jsp.v8i2.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was primarily conducted to find out the total amount of grammatical errors and to analyze kinds of morphological and syntactical errors made by the fifth semester students of English Language Education Study Program of Catholic University of Saint Thomas in the Academic Year of 2018/2019 in their English compositions. There are 22 students as the research subject of the study. The writers collected the data by asking the students to write down an English composition entitled My Unforgettable Experience. The grammatical errors made by the students were analyzed based on linguistic category taxonomy (morphological and syntactical errors) proposed by Dulay et al (1982). Based on the data analysis, it was found that there are 400 grammatical errors altogether (277 morphological errors and 123 syntactical errors) made by the research subject in their English compositions. In morphological errors, the students dominantly made errors in past tense, namely 247 errors (89.2%). Next, the students made 14 errors in definite article (5.0%), 10 errors in third singular verb (3.6%), 2 errors in comparative adjective/adverb (0.7%), 2 errors in regular/irregular verbs (0.7%), 1 error in possessive case (0.4%), and 1 error in past participle (0.4%). In syntactical errors, the students dominantly made errors in transformation, namely 42 errors (34.15%). Next, the students made 30 errors in verb construction (24.39%), 25 errors in word order (20.33%), 24 errors in verb phrase (19.51%), and 2 errors in noun phrase (1.62%). It is advisable that the students had better master English grammar very well and need to equip themselves with at least a number of fundamental abilities such as how to use punctuations and construct simple sentences in the English language correctly, and the English teachers/lecturers had better explain English grammar and teach how to construct simple sentences in the English language correctly. \n  \nKeywords: Error analysis, grammatical errors, morphological errors, syntactical errors, English compositions","PeriodicalId":304649,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36655/jsp.v8i2.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was primarily conducted to find out the total amount of grammatical errors and to analyze kinds of morphological and syntactical errors made by the fifth semester students of English Language Education Study Program of Catholic University of Saint Thomas in the Academic Year of 2018/2019 in their English compositions. There are 22 students as the research subject of the study. The writers collected the data by asking the students to write down an English composition entitled My Unforgettable Experience. The grammatical errors made by the students were analyzed based on linguistic category taxonomy (morphological and syntactical errors) proposed by Dulay et al (1982). Based on the data analysis, it was found that there are 400 grammatical errors altogether (277 morphological errors and 123 syntactical errors) made by the research subject in their English compositions. In morphological errors, the students dominantly made errors in past tense, namely 247 errors (89.2%). Next, the students made 14 errors in definite article (5.0%), 10 errors in third singular verb (3.6%), 2 errors in comparative adjective/adverb (0.7%), 2 errors in regular/irregular verbs (0.7%), 1 error in possessive case (0.4%), and 1 error in past participle (0.4%). In syntactical errors, the students dominantly made errors in transformation, namely 42 errors (34.15%). Next, the students made 30 errors in verb construction (24.39%), 25 errors in word order (20.33%), 24 errors in verb phrase (19.51%), and 2 errors in noun phrase (1.62%). It is advisable that the students had better master English grammar very well and need to equip themselves with at least a number of fundamental abilities such as how to use punctuations and construct simple sentences in the English language correctly, and the English teachers/lecturers had better explain English grammar and teach how to construct simple sentences in the English language correctly.   Keywords: Error analysis, grammatical errors, morphological errors, syntactical errors, English compositions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣托马斯天主教大学英语语言教育专业第五学期学生英语作文中的错误分析
本研究主要是调查圣托马斯天主教大学英语语言教育研究项目2018/2019学年第五学期学生在英语作文中出现的语法错误总数,并分析各种形态和句法错误。本研究以22名学生为研究对象。作者通过让学生写一篇题为“我难忘的经历”的英语作文来收集数据。根据Dulay et al .(1982)提出的语言范畴分类法(形态和句法错误)对学生的语法错误进行分析。通过数据分析发现,研究对象在英语作文中总共出现了400个语法错误,其中形态学错误277个,句法错误123个。在形态错误中,学生以过去时错误为主,共有247个错误(89.2%)。其次,定冠词错误14个(5.0%),第三人称单数动词错误10个(3.6%),形容词/副词比较级错误2个(0.7%),规则/不规则动词错误2个(0.7%),所有格错误1个(0.4%),过去分词错误1个(0.4%)。在句法错误中,学生以转换错误为主,共有42个错误(34.15%)。其次,学生动词结构错误30个(24.39%),语序错误25个(20.33%),动词短语错误24个(19.51%),名词短语错误2个(1.62%)。建议学生最好能很好地掌握英语语法,至少要掌握一些基本的能力,比如如何正确地使用标点符号和构造英语简单句,英语老师/讲师最好能解释英语语法并教他们如何正确地构造英语简单句。关键词:错误分析,语法错误,形态错误,句法错误,英语作文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATA PELAJARAN GAMBAR TEKNIK PENGARUH KOMPETENSI DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KOMISI PEGAWAI PEMILIHAN UMUM(KPU) KOTA GUNUNGSITOLI ANALISIS KREDIT MACET PADA KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM CU DOSNITAHI PINANGSORI WILAYAH NIAS KANTOR UNIT PELAYANAN ANGGOTA ANALISIS STRATEGI HARGA DALAM MENINGKATKAN LOYALITAS PENGGUNA JASA SERVICE MOTOR HONDA PADA AHASS PT. KENCANA MULIA ABADI GUNUNGSITOLI PENGEMBANGAN MODUL BERBASIS INKUIRI PADA MATA PELAJARAN GAMBAR TEKNIK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1