A comparison of forecasting methods for hotel room occupancy

N. M. Desa, Muzhaffar Bin Mohamad Marzuki
{"title":"A comparison of forecasting methods for hotel room occupancy","authors":"N. M. Desa, Muzhaffar Bin Mohamad Marzuki","doi":"10.1063/1.5121114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a few types of forecasting categories that have been used such as hotel room occupancy forecast. Implementation of this forecasting category can be crucial because it leads to an efficient planning for, and decision making to all the hotel departments. Thus, this study aims to compare the best forecasting method for hotel room occupancy. Therefore, Seasonal Naive, Seasonal Holt Winter’s Method and ARIMA are going to be implemented in order to determine which forecasting method is most suitable to forecast hotel room occupancy by using secondary data from year 2012 until 2017. The selection of best method is based on three error measurements which are root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean absolute error (MAE). From the analysis conducted, the results show the best method to be implemented is the Seasonal Holt Winter’s Multiplicative method since it shows the lowest error for all three measurements. Furthermore, the forecast of future hotel room occupancy for year 2018 shows similar pattern as previous years. In comparing 2018 future occupancy with 2017 actual occupancy, there are some increment and decrement in hotel room occupancy for various months.There are a few types of forecasting categories that have been used such as hotel room occupancy forecast. Implementation of this forecasting category can be crucial because it leads to an efficient planning for, and decision making to all the hotel departments. Thus, this study aims to compare the best forecasting method for hotel room occupancy. Therefore, Seasonal Naive, Seasonal Holt Winter’s Method and ARIMA are going to be implemented in order to determine which forecasting method is most suitable to forecast hotel room occupancy by using secondary data from year 2012 until 2017. The selection of best method is based on three error measurements which are root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean absolute error (MAE). From the analysis conducted, the results show the best method to be implemented is the Seasonal Holt Winter’s Multiplicative method since it shows the lowest error for all three measurements. Furthermore, the forecast of future hotel room occupancy fo...","PeriodicalId":325925,"journal":{"name":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are a few types of forecasting categories that have been used such as hotel room occupancy forecast. Implementation of this forecasting category can be crucial because it leads to an efficient planning for, and decision making to all the hotel departments. Thus, this study aims to compare the best forecasting method for hotel room occupancy. Therefore, Seasonal Naive, Seasonal Holt Winter’s Method and ARIMA are going to be implemented in order to determine which forecasting method is most suitable to forecast hotel room occupancy by using secondary data from year 2012 until 2017. The selection of best method is based on three error measurements which are root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean absolute error (MAE). From the analysis conducted, the results show the best method to be implemented is the Seasonal Holt Winter’s Multiplicative method since it shows the lowest error for all three measurements. Furthermore, the forecast of future hotel room occupancy for year 2018 shows similar pattern as previous years. In comparing 2018 future occupancy with 2017 actual occupancy, there are some increment and decrement in hotel room occupancy for various months.There are a few types of forecasting categories that have been used such as hotel room occupancy forecast. Implementation of this forecasting category can be crucial because it leads to an efficient planning for, and decision making to all the hotel departments. Thus, this study aims to compare the best forecasting method for hotel room occupancy. Therefore, Seasonal Naive, Seasonal Holt Winter’s Method and ARIMA are going to be implemented in order to determine which forecasting method is most suitable to forecast hotel room occupancy by using secondary data from year 2012 until 2017. The selection of best method is based on three error measurements which are root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean absolute error (MAE). From the analysis conducted, the results show the best method to be implemented is the Seasonal Holt Winter’s Multiplicative method since it shows the lowest error for all three measurements. Furthermore, the forecast of future hotel room occupancy fo...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒店客房入住率预测方法的比较
有几种类型的预测类别已经被使用,如酒店房间入住率预测。这类预测的实施是至关重要的,因为它可以为所有酒店部门提供有效的计划和决策。因此,本研究旨在比较最佳的酒店客房入住率预测方法。因此,为了确定哪一种预测方法最适合使用2012年至2017年的二手数据预测酒店客房入住率,将实施季节性天真,季节性霍尔特冬季方法和ARIMA。最佳方法的选择基于三种误差测量,即均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)。从所进行的分析中,结果表明最好的方法是季节性霍尔特冬季乘法法,因为它显示了所有三种测量的最低误差。此外,对2018年未来酒店客房入住率的预测显示出与往年相似的模式。2018年未来入住率与2017年实际入住率比较,各月份酒店客房入住率均有增减。有几种类型的预测类别已经被使用,如酒店房间入住率预测。这类预测的实施是至关重要的,因为它可以为所有酒店部门提供有效的计划和决策。因此,本研究旨在比较最佳的酒店客房入住率预测方法。因此,为了确定哪一种预测方法最适合使用2012年至2017年的二手数据预测酒店客房入住率,将实施季节性天真,季节性霍尔特冬季方法和ARIMA。最佳方法的选择基于三种误差测量,即均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)。从所进行的分析中,结果表明最好的方法是季节性霍尔特冬季乘法法,因为它显示了所有三种测量的最低误差。此外,对未来酒店客房入住率的预测…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of artificial intelligence in predicting ground settlement on earth slope The most important contaminants of air pollutants in Klang station using multivariate statistical analysis Tourism knowledge discovery through data mining techniques On some specific patterns of τ-adic non-adjacent form expansion over ring Z(τ): An alternative formula Exploratory factor analysis on occupational stress in context of Malaysian sewerage operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1