Amici Brief of Labor Relations and Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Massachusetts Wage Campaign, in Meshna v. Scrivanos, SJC 11618

H. Freeman, Audrey Richardson
{"title":"Amici Brief of Labor Relations and Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Massachusetts Wage Campaign, in Meshna v. Scrivanos, SJC 11618","authors":"H. Freeman, Audrey Richardson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2522936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amici brief submitted by the Labor Relations and Research Center, University of Massachusetts, and the Massachusetts Wage Campaign, to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in the case of Meshna v. Scrivanos. The brief argues that the Massachusetts Tips Act prohibits no-tipping policies and that it does not sanction such no-tipping policies as a lawful business response to customer demand or preference. Furthermore, it argues that no-tipping policies contribute to the impoverishment of the low-wage workforce and foist the social and economic costs of tipping bans onto citizen-tax payers.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"32 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2522936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amici brief submitted by the Labor Relations and Research Center, University of Massachusetts, and the Massachusetts Wage Campaign, to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in the case of Meshna v. Scrivanos. The brief argues that the Massachusetts Tips Act prohibits no-tipping policies and that it does not sanction such no-tipping policies as a lawful business response to customer demand or preference. Furthermore, it argues that no-tipping policies contribute to the impoverishment of the low-wage workforce and foist the social and economic costs of tipping bans onto citizen-tax payers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马萨诸塞大学劳资关系和研究中心Amherst和马萨诸塞工资运动案,Meshna v. Scrivanos, SJC 11618
由马萨诸塞大学劳资关系和研究中心以及马萨诸塞工资运动向马萨诸塞最高司法法院就Meshna诉Scrivanos案提交的Amici摘要。诉状辩称,马萨诸塞州小费法案禁止不给小费的政策,它不认可这种不给小费的政策是对顾客需求或偏好的合法商业反应。此外,它还认为,不给小费的政策导致了低工资劳动力的贫困,并将给小费禁令的社会和经济成本强加给了公民纳税人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work from/for Home: Recommendations to Ease Post-Pandemic Multiple Burden on Women Teleworking in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Enabling Conditions for a Successful Transition A Summary of the Statistical Aspects of the Procedures for Resolving Potential Employment Discrimination Recently Issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Along with a Commentary Creative Labour in the Era of Covid-19: The Case of Freelancers Non-Competes and Other Contracts of Dispossession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1