Sanctions, Benefits, and Rights: Three Faces of Accountability

M. Grindle
{"title":"Sanctions, Benefits, and Rights: Three Faces of Accountability","authors":"M. Grindle","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1724737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As countries throughout the world democratize and decentralize, citizen participation in public life should increase. In this paper, I suggest that democratic participation in local government is enhanced when citizens can reply affirmatively to at least three questions about their ability to hold local officials accountable for their actions: Can citizens use the vote effectively to reward and punish the general or specific performance of local public officials and/or the parties they represent? Can citizens generate response to their collective needs from local governments? Can citizens be ensured of fair and equitable treatment from public agencies at local levels? The findings of a study of 30 randomly selected municipalities in Mexico indicate that, over the course of a decade and a half, voters were able to enforce alternation in power and the circulation of elites, but not necessarily to transmit unambiguous messages to public officials or parties about performance concerns. More definitively, citizens were able to build successfully on prior political experiences to extract benefits from local governments. At the same time, the ability to demand good performance of local government as a right of citizenship lagged behind other forms of accountability.","PeriodicalId":126809,"journal":{"name":"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1724737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

As countries throughout the world democratize and decentralize, citizen participation in public life should increase. In this paper, I suggest that democratic participation in local government is enhanced when citizens can reply affirmatively to at least three questions about their ability to hold local officials accountable for their actions: Can citizens use the vote effectively to reward and punish the general or specific performance of local public officials and/or the parties they represent? Can citizens generate response to their collective needs from local governments? Can citizens be ensured of fair and equitable treatment from public agencies at local levels? The findings of a study of 30 randomly selected municipalities in Mexico indicate that, over the course of a decade and a half, voters were able to enforce alternation in power and the circulation of elites, but not necessarily to transmit unambiguous messages to public officials or parties about performance concerns. More definitively, citizens were able to build successfully on prior political experiences to extract benefits from local governments. At the same time, the ability to demand good performance of local government as a right of citizenship lagged behind other forms of accountability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制裁、利益和权利:问责制的三个方面
随着世界各国的民主化和权力下放,公民对公共生活的参与应该增加。在本文中,我建议,当公民能够肯定地回答至少三个关于他们要求地方官员对其行为负责的能力的问题时,地方政府的民主参与就会得到加强:公民能否有效地利用投票来奖励和惩罚地方公职人员和/或他们所代表的政党的一般或具体表现?公民能否从地方政府那里得到对他们集体需求的回应?能否确保公民从地方一级的公共机构得到公平和公平的待遇?对墨西哥30个随机选择的城市进行的一项研究表明,在15年的时间里,选民能够强制执行权力的交替和精英的循环,但不一定能向公职人员或政党传达关于绩效问题的明确信息。更确切地说,公民能够成功地利用先前的政治经验,从地方政府那里榨取利益。与此同时,要求地方政府表现良好作为公民权利的能力落后于其他形式的问责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Yin and Yang of Corporations and Democracy Climate, diseases, and the origins of corruption Tales of the Fall and Rise of (In)Egalitarian Democracy: The Case of Argentina (1913-1999) Investigation and Prosecution of Terrorism Under the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013 Designing E-Voting As An ‘Apparatus’ For Combating Election Rigging: A Nigerian Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1