The Many and the One

D. Nikulin
{"title":"The Many and the One","authors":"D. Nikulin","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190662363.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to Plotinus’ treatment of the one and the many, Chapter 7 is devoted to the discussion of the same problem in the opening sections of Proclus’ Theologia Platonica II 1–3. Beginning the deduction of his grand philosophical synthesis with only two elements in reference to the first two hypotheses of Plato’s Parmenides, Proclus demonstrates that both the one and the many are necessary for the generation of the plurality of henadic, intelligible, psychic, and physical phenomena. While the many is dependent on the one and the one is not dependent on anything, the interaction between the one and the many is essential for the constitution of being. Through a number of precise and subtle arguments, Proclus further establishes the structure of participation as defined by the triad of the unparticipated–participated–participating, which is then applied to the clarification of a number of difficulties and implicit presuppositions in the text.","PeriodicalId":118183,"journal":{"name":"Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190662363.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to Plotinus’ treatment of the one and the many, Chapter 7 is devoted to the discussion of the same problem in the opening sections of Proclus’ Theologia Platonica II 1–3. Beginning the deduction of his grand philosophical synthesis with only two elements in reference to the first two hypotheses of Plato’s Parmenides, Proclus demonstrates that both the one and the many are necessary for the generation of the plurality of henadic, intelligible, psychic, and physical phenomena. While the many is dependent on the one and the one is not dependent on anything, the interaction between the one and the many is essential for the constitution of being. Through a number of precise and subtle arguments, Proclus further establishes the structure of participation as defined by the triad of the unparticipated–participated–participating, which is then applied to the clarification of a number of difficulties and implicit presuppositions in the text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
众与一
为了回应普罗提诺对“一”和“多”的论述,第七章致力于讨论普罗克劳斯《柏拉图神学》第1-3章开头部分的相同问题。普罗克劳斯根据柏拉图的《巴门尼德》的前两个假设,以两个要素开始了他的大哲学综合的演绎,证明了一和多对于产生多元的、可理解的、精神的和物理的现象都是必要的。虽然“多”依赖于“一”,而“一”不依赖于任何东西,但“一”与“多”之间的相互作用对于存在的构成至关重要。通过一系列精确而微妙的论证,Proclus进一步建立了参与的结构,这是由非参与-参与-参与的三位一体定义的,然后应用于澄清文本中的一些困难和隐含的预设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beauty, Truth, and Being Imagination and Mathematics The System of Physics Unity and Individuation of the Soul Number and Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1