On the pragmatics of logical connectives

J. Moeschler
{"title":"On the pragmatics of logical connectives","authors":"J. Moeschler","doi":"10.1515/9783110607963-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the issue of connectives in natural language, adopting a formalist approach in pragmatics. The outcome is that truth-conditional connectives are limited to conjunction, disjunction and conditional, and that negation, even in its metalinguistic and non-truth-conditional usages, has representational contextual effects, as suppressing a proposition and a presupposition or strengthening a proposition. As regards discourse connectives, they exhibits a strong pragmatic property, that is, they almost all exhibit factivity. Finally, quasi-synonym connectives, as causal ones, do not differ in meaning but in the way their conceptual and procedural meanings are distributed at different layers.","PeriodicalId":244606,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of Linguistic Variation","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607963-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of connectives in natural language, adopting a formalist approach in pragmatics. The outcome is that truth-conditional connectives are limited to conjunction, disjunction and conditional, and that negation, even in its metalinguistic and non-truth-conditional usages, has representational contextual effects, as suppressing a proposition and a presupposition or strengthening a proposition. As regards discourse connectives, they exhibits a strong pragmatic property, that is, they almost all exhibit factivity. Finally, quasi-synonym connectives, as causal ones, do not differ in meaning but in the way their conceptual and procedural meanings are distributed at different layers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论逻辑连接词的语用
本文从语用学的角度出发,探讨了自然语言中的连接词问题。结果是,真-条件连接词仅限于连接、分离和条件,而否定,即使在元语言和非真-条件用法中,也具有表征语境效应,如抑制命题和前提或加强命题。就语篇连接词而言,它们表现出强烈的语用特性,即它们几乎都表现出行为性。最后,作为因果关系的准同义词连接词在意义上并无差异,只是其概念意义和程序意义在不同层次上的分布方式不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The areal factor in lexical typology ‘Perhaps’ in Cape York Peninsula Binding scale dynamics Frontmatter Definite articles and their uses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1