Sexual Function of Men Undergoing Active Prostate Cancer Treatment Versus Active Surveillance: Results of the Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study

L. Venderbos, A. Deschamps, J. Dowling, Ernst-Günther Carl, H. Poppel, S. Remmers, M. Roobol
{"title":"Sexual Function of Men Undergoing Active Prostate Cancer Treatment Versus Active Surveillance: Results of the Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study","authors":"L. Venderbos, A. Deschamps, J. Dowling, Ernst-Günther Carl, H. Poppel, S. Remmers, M. Roobol","doi":"10.17925/ohr.2022.18.1.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Europa Uomo initiated the Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS) to inform future patients with prostate cancer about the impact of prostate cancer treatment on sexual function. Methods: A one-time online survey was conducted among patients with prostate cancer who underwent treatment for the disease. The survey included the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short form 26 (EPIC-26) and questions on the use of medications or devices to aid/improve erections in men. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the EPIC-26 sexual domain and the use of medications or devices. Results: Men on active surveillance reported the highest median sexual function scores (57.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 26.3–83.3) compared with men who underwent radical prostatectomy (20.8, IQR: 8.3–44.5) or radiotherapy (17.3, IQR: 9.7–40.3). Of the men on active surveillance, 44.7% reported “very poor to none/poor ability” to have an erection compared with 71.7–88.2% of the men undergoing active treatment for prostate cancer. Of the men treated actively, 66.6–88.3% rated their ability to function sexually as “very poor/poor” compared with 43.1% for men on active surveillance; more than half of the men who underwent radical prostatectomy viewed their lack of sexual function as a moderate or big problem for which they had tried medications or devices. Conclusions: The EUPROMS study showed that the impact of prostate cancer treatment on sexual function can be significant and non-negligible. These data can be used in daily clinical practice to guide the preference-sensitive decisionmaking process faced by patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":249239,"journal":{"name":"Oncology & Haematology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology & Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/ohr.2022.18.1.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Europa Uomo initiated the Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS) to inform future patients with prostate cancer about the impact of prostate cancer treatment on sexual function. Methods: A one-time online survey was conducted among patients with prostate cancer who underwent treatment for the disease. The survey included the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short form 26 (EPIC-26) and questions on the use of medications or devices to aid/improve erections in men. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the EPIC-26 sexual domain and the use of medications or devices. Results: Men on active surveillance reported the highest median sexual function scores (57.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 26.3–83.3) compared with men who underwent radical prostatectomy (20.8, IQR: 8.3–44.5) or radiotherapy (17.3, IQR: 9.7–40.3). Of the men on active surveillance, 44.7% reported “very poor to none/poor ability” to have an erection compared with 71.7–88.2% of the men undergoing active treatment for prostate cancer. Of the men treated actively, 66.6–88.3% rated their ability to function sexually as “very poor/poor” compared with 43.1% for men on active surveillance; more than half of the men who underwent radical prostatectomy viewed their lack of sexual function as a moderate or big problem for which they had tried medications or devices. Conclusions: The EUPROMS study showed that the impact of prostate cancer treatment on sexual function can be significant and non-negligible. These data can be used in daily clinical practice to guide the preference-sensitive decisionmaking process faced by patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受积极前列腺癌治疗的男性性功能与积极监测:Europa Uomo患者报告结果研究的结果
背景:Europa Uomo发起了Europa Uomo患者报告结果研究(EUPROMS),旨在告知未来前列腺癌患者前列腺癌治疗对性功能的影响。方法:对接受治疗的前列腺癌患者进行一次性在线调查。该调查包括扩展前列腺癌指数综合简短表格26 (EPIC-26)和关于使用药物或设备来帮助/改善男性勃起的问题。描述性统计用于分析EPIC-26性域和药物或器械的使用。结果:与接受根治性前列腺切除术(20.8,IQR: 8.3-44.5)或放疗(17.3,IQR: 9.7-40.3)的男性相比,接受主动监测的男性的性功能评分中位数最高(57.0,四分位间距[IQR]: 26.3-83.3)。在接受积极监测的男性中,44.7%的人报告勃起能力“非常差到没有/很差”,而接受前列腺癌积极治疗的男性中,这一比例为71.7-88.2%。在积极接受治疗的男性中,66.6-88.3%的人认为自己的性行为能力“非常差/差”,而积极接受监测的男性中这一比例为43.1%;在接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性中,超过一半的人认为他们的性功能缺失是一个中度或严重的问题,他们已经尝试过药物或器械治疗。结论:EUPROMS研究表明前列腺癌治疗对性功能的影响是显著的,不可忽视的。这些数据可用于日常临床实践,指导新诊断前列腺癌患者面临的偏好敏感决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zanubrutinib for the Treatment of B-cell Malignancies Trilaciclib: A First-in-class Therapy to Reduce Chemotherapy-induced Myelosuppression Pafolacianine: A Diagnostic Agent to Identify Lung Cancer Lesions in Adults with Known or Suspected Lung Cancer Use of Circulating Tumour DNA to Assess Minimal Residual Disease in Gastrointestinal Cancers Maximizing Immunotherapy in Sarcoma Using Histology, Biomarkers and Novel Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1