Wireless Transport Layer Congestion Control Evaluation

S. Ahuja, W. R. Shore
{"title":"Wireless Transport Layer Congestion Control Evaluation","authors":"S. Ahuja, W. R. Shore","doi":"10.4018/ijwnbt.2011070105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of transport layer protocols can be affected differently due to wireless congestion, as opposed to network congestion. Using an active network evaluation strategy in a real world test-bed experiment, the Transport Control Protocol TCP, Datagram Congestion Control Protocol DCCP, and Stream Control Transport Protocol SCTP were evaluated to determine their effectiveness in terms of throughput, fairness, and smoothness. Though TCP's fairness was shown to suffer in wireless congestion, the results showed that it still outperforms the alternative protocols in both wireless congestion, and network congestion. In terms of smoothness, the TCP-like congestion control algorithm of DCCP did outperform TCP in wireless congestion, but at the expense of throughput and ensuing fairness. SCTP's congestion control algorithm was also found to provide better smoothness in wireless congestion. In fact, it provided smoother throughput performance than in the network congestion.","PeriodicalId":422249,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Wirel. Networks Broadband Technol.","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Wirel. Networks Broadband Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwnbt.2011070105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

The performance of transport layer protocols can be affected differently due to wireless congestion, as opposed to network congestion. Using an active network evaluation strategy in a real world test-bed experiment, the Transport Control Protocol TCP, Datagram Congestion Control Protocol DCCP, and Stream Control Transport Protocol SCTP were evaluated to determine their effectiveness in terms of throughput, fairness, and smoothness. Though TCP's fairness was shown to suffer in wireless congestion, the results showed that it still outperforms the alternative protocols in both wireless congestion, and network congestion. In terms of smoothness, the TCP-like congestion control algorithm of DCCP did outperform TCP in wireless congestion, but at the expense of throughput and ensuing fairness. SCTP's congestion control algorithm was also found to provide better smoothness in wireless congestion. In fact, it provided smoother throughput performance than in the network congestion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无线传输层拥塞控制评估
由于无线拥塞,传输层协议的性能可能受到不同程度的影响,而不是网络拥塞。在现实世界的试验台实验中,使用主动网络评估策略,对传输控制协议TCP、数据报拥塞控制协议DCCP和流控制传输协议SCTP进行了评估,以确定它们在吞吐量、公平性和平滑性方面的有效性。尽管TCP的公平性在无线拥塞中受到影响,但结果表明它在无线拥塞和网络拥塞中仍然优于替代协议。在平滑度方面,DCCP的类TCP拥塞控制算法在无线拥塞方面确实优于TCP,但以牺牲吞吐量和随后的公平性为代价。SCTP的拥塞控制算法在无线拥塞中提供了更好的平滑性。实际上,它提供了比网络拥塞时更平滑的吞吐量性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overload Detection and Energy Conserving Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Communication Wireless Interference Analysis for Home IoT Security Vulnerability Detection A Dynamic Model for Quality of Service Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks A Binary Search Algorithm to Determine the Minimum Transmission Range for Minimum Connected Dominating Set of a Threshold Size in Ad Hoc Networks A Resource-Efficient Approach on User Association in 5G Networks Using Downlink and Uplink Decoupling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1