Survival of Bifidobacteria and their usefulness in Faecal Source Tracking

C. Luyt, S. Khamanga, W. J. Muller, R. Tandlich
{"title":"Survival of Bifidobacteria and their usefulness in Faecal Source Tracking","authors":"C. Luyt, S. Khamanga, W. J. Muller, R. Tandlich","doi":"10.1515/lwr-2015-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Bifidobacteria have long since been recommended as indicators of human and animal pollution. Concentration ratio (tracking ratio) of the sorbitol-utilising bifidobacteria (SUB) and the total bifidobacteria (TB) can be used to distinguish between animal and human sources of faecal water contamination. The cut-off value needs to be calibrated in a given geographical area. Seven sites with permanent faecal contamination were selected in South Africa. Concentrations of SUB ranged from 10-50000 cells/100 mL, while TB ranged from 0-8000 cells/100 mL. The tracking ratio ranged from 0.10 to 6.25, but no clear cut-off value could be established. The YN-17 agar was replaced for TB with the modified Beerens medium with pH = 5.70, to suppress the growth of faecal streptococci. Tracking ratios observed are most likely the results of different survival rates of SUB and TB. Bifidobacteria die-off due to nutrients was not found to be significant using design of experiment. Thus a lack of continuous input or oxygen levels in water may be major factors. This would limit the ratios used as a faecal source tracking method.","PeriodicalId":398965,"journal":{"name":"Waste Treatment and Recovery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Treatment and Recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lwr-2015-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract: Bifidobacteria have long since been recommended as indicators of human and animal pollution. Concentration ratio (tracking ratio) of the sorbitol-utilising bifidobacteria (SUB) and the total bifidobacteria (TB) can be used to distinguish between animal and human sources of faecal water contamination. The cut-off value needs to be calibrated in a given geographical area. Seven sites with permanent faecal contamination were selected in South Africa. Concentrations of SUB ranged from 10-50000 cells/100 mL, while TB ranged from 0-8000 cells/100 mL. The tracking ratio ranged from 0.10 to 6.25, but no clear cut-off value could be established. The YN-17 agar was replaced for TB with the modified Beerens medium with pH = 5.70, to suppress the growth of faecal streptococci. Tracking ratios observed are most likely the results of different survival rates of SUB and TB. Bifidobacteria die-off due to nutrients was not found to be significant using design of experiment. Thus a lack of continuous input or oxygen levels in water may be major factors. This would limit the ratios used as a faecal source tracking method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双歧杆菌的存活及其在粪便源追踪中的应用
摘要:双歧杆菌早就被推荐作为人类和动物污染的指标。利用山梨醇双歧杆菌(SUB)和总双歧杆菌(TB)的浓度比(追踪比)可用于区分动物和人类粪便水污染源。截止值需要在给定的地理区域进行校准。在南非选定了7个有永久粪便污染的地点。SUB浓度范围为10 ~ 50000个细胞/100 mL, TB浓度范围为0 ~ 8000个细胞/100 mL,追踪比范围为0.10 ~ 6.25,但没有明确的临界值。用pH = 5.70的改良Beerens培养基代替n -17琼脂,抑制粪链球菌的生长。观察到的追踪比率很可能是亚结核和结核病不同存活率的结果。根据试验设计,双歧杆菌因营养物质而死亡的影响不显著。因此,缺乏持续的输入或水中的氧气水平可能是主要因素。这将限制用作粪便源追踪方法的比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Pharmaceutical Process Wastewater with Hybrid Separation Method: Distillation and Hydrophilic Pervaporation COD reduction of process wastewater with vacuum evaporation Whey utilization in a two-stage fermentation process Complex whey utilization: the propionic acid alternative Lactic acid production from cane molasses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1