Acromioclavicular hook plate versus anatomical reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligaments using hamstring autograft in acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Rashwan Amr
{"title":"Acromioclavicular hook plate versus anatomical reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligaments using hamstring autograft in acromioclavicular joint dislocation","authors":"Rashwan Amr","doi":"10.4103/2665-9190.330536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries can result from a multitude of causes. Most injuries occur during activities with high-impact risks such as contact sports, football, ice hockey, and wrestling, with male athletes at greater risk than female athletes. The stability of AC joint depends on the joint capsule, the acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments, and the intraarticular fibrocartilaginous disc. The choice of the required surgical technique for the management of AC disruption is a controversial issue owing to the abundance of the surgical options described for treatment. However, the clinical superiority of these procedures remains debatable, and various complications have been reported. Hypothesis This hypothesis is that the anatomical reconstruction of the CC ligaments may render better long-term functional and radiological results compared with the use of a hook plate in ACJ dislocations. Patients and methods This is a prospective nonrandomized comparative study that was held between August 2011 and January 2017 at Cairo University Hospitals. It included 64 patients with acute AC dislocation type III–VI and divided into two groups: group A, which underwent anatomic reconstruction of CC and AC ligaments, and group B, which underwent ACJ dislocation using the hook plate. The mean age of group A patients was 43.22±11.46 years, whereas it was 41.56±8.70 years in group B. There were 22 male and 10 female patients in group A compared with 21 male and 11 female patients in group B. The mean time from injury was 8.41±3.41 weeks in group A compared with 9.91±1.59 weeks in group B. The average follow-up was 64.06±4.24 months in group A versus 63.94±3.79 months in group B. The clinical outcome was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 2, and 5 years using the visual analog scale, Constant score, and American shoulder and elbow surgeon score. Radiological assessment included the measurement of the CC distance (vertical displacement) and the anteroposterior (horizontal) displacement preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 year and at the final follow-up. Results Regarding the clinical outcome, the visual analog scale score improved from 7.06±1.22 preoperatively to 1.06±1.07 at 5-year follow-up in group A, whereas it improved from 7.5±0.92 preoperatively to 2.97±0.59 at 5-year follow-up in group B, with P=0.000. Similarly, the American shoulder and elbow surgeon score improved from 26.64±8.15 preoperatively to 92.06±5.37 postoperatively in group A, whereas in group B, it improved from 19.87±7.56 preoperatively to 77.1±5.40 postoperatively (P=0.000). The constant score in group A improved from 20.44±2.66 preoperatively to 92.91±3.64 postoperatively, and in group B, it improved from 20.13±2.29 preoperatively to 80.53±4.76 postoperatively (P=0.000). The radiological assessment at the final follow-up showed that the anteroposterior (horizontal) displacement in group A was 4.31±2.62 preoperatively and became 1.06±1.01 postoperatively, whereas in group B, it was 5.56±2.12 preoperatively and became 3.41±1.29 postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.000). The superior displacement in group A was 21.57±5.09 mm preoperatively and decreased to 10.61±1.02 postoperatively compared with 23.99±5.92 preoperatively, which decreased to 13.36±3.67 postoperatively in group B, with statistically significant difference (P=0.001). Conclusion The concomitant anatomical reconstruction of the CC and AC ligaments using autograft provides long-term functional outcome and mechanical stability in both the vertical and horizontal translation compared with the hook plate fixation in acute unstable ACJ dislocation.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2665-9190.330536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries can result from a multitude of causes. Most injuries occur during activities with high-impact risks such as contact sports, football, ice hockey, and wrestling, with male athletes at greater risk than female athletes. The stability of AC joint depends on the joint capsule, the acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments, and the intraarticular fibrocartilaginous disc. The choice of the required surgical technique for the management of AC disruption is a controversial issue owing to the abundance of the surgical options described for treatment. However, the clinical superiority of these procedures remains debatable, and various complications have been reported. Hypothesis This hypothesis is that the anatomical reconstruction of the CC ligaments may render better long-term functional and radiological results compared with the use of a hook plate in ACJ dislocations. Patients and methods This is a prospective nonrandomized comparative study that was held between August 2011 and January 2017 at Cairo University Hospitals. It included 64 patients with acute AC dislocation type III–VI and divided into two groups: group A, which underwent anatomic reconstruction of CC and AC ligaments, and group B, which underwent ACJ dislocation using the hook plate. The mean age of group A patients was 43.22±11.46 years, whereas it was 41.56±8.70 years in group B. There were 22 male and 10 female patients in group A compared with 21 male and 11 female patients in group B. The mean time from injury was 8.41±3.41 weeks in group A compared with 9.91±1.59 weeks in group B. The average follow-up was 64.06±4.24 months in group A versus 63.94±3.79 months in group B. The clinical outcome was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 2, and 5 years using the visual analog scale, Constant score, and American shoulder and elbow surgeon score. Radiological assessment included the measurement of the CC distance (vertical displacement) and the anteroposterior (horizontal) displacement preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 year and at the final follow-up. Results Regarding the clinical outcome, the visual analog scale score improved from 7.06±1.22 preoperatively to 1.06±1.07 at 5-year follow-up in group A, whereas it improved from 7.5±0.92 preoperatively to 2.97±0.59 at 5-year follow-up in group B, with P=0.000. Similarly, the American shoulder and elbow surgeon score improved from 26.64±8.15 preoperatively to 92.06±5.37 postoperatively in group A, whereas in group B, it improved from 19.87±7.56 preoperatively to 77.1±5.40 postoperatively (P=0.000). The constant score in group A improved from 20.44±2.66 preoperatively to 92.91±3.64 postoperatively, and in group B, it improved from 20.13±2.29 preoperatively to 80.53±4.76 postoperatively (P=0.000). The radiological assessment at the final follow-up showed that the anteroposterior (horizontal) displacement in group A was 4.31±2.62 preoperatively and became 1.06±1.01 postoperatively, whereas in group B, it was 5.56±2.12 preoperatively and became 3.41±1.29 postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.000). The superior displacement in group A was 21.57±5.09 mm preoperatively and decreased to 10.61±1.02 postoperatively compared with 23.99±5.92 preoperatively, which decreased to 13.36±3.67 postoperatively in group B, with statistically significant difference (P=0.001). Conclusion The concomitant anatomical reconstruction of the CC and AC ligaments using autograft provides long-term functional outcome and mechanical stability in both the vertical and horizontal translation compared with the hook plate fixation in acute unstable ACJ dislocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩锁关节脱位后肩锁钩钢板与自体腘绳肌腱移植重建喙锁韧带的比较
肩锁关节(ACJ)损伤可由多种原因引起。大多数损伤发生在高冲击风险的运动中,如身体接触运动、足球、冰球和摔跤,男性运动员比女性运动员的风险更大。AC关节的稳定性依赖于关节囊、肩锁韧带(AC)和喙锁韧带(CC)以及关节内纤维软骨盘。由于有大量的手术治疗方案,选择所需的手术技术来管理交流中断是一个有争议的问题。然而,这些手术的临床优势仍有争议,各种并发症已被报道。该假说认为,与使用钩钢板治疗ACJ脱位相比,CC韧带的解剖重建可能提供更好的长期功能和放射学结果。这是一项前瞻性非随机比较研究,于2011年8月至2017年1月在开罗大学医院进行。本研究纳入64例III-VI型急性AC脱位患者,分为两组:A组行CC和AC韧带解剖重建,B组行钩钢板行ACJ脱位。A组患者的平均年龄为43.22±11.46岁,而这是41.56±8.70年在b组有22男10女病人组与21岁男性和11个女性患者相比在b组的平均时间从伤病是8.41±3.41周相比,A组与b组平均9.91±1.59周随访组为64.06±4.24个月和63.94±3.79个月在b组的临床结果评估术前和术后1、2、5年使用视觉模拟量表、恒常评分和美国肩关节外科医生评分。放射学评估包括术前、术后1年和最后随访时测量CC距离(垂直位移)和前后位(水平位移)。结果A组5年随访时视觉模拟量表评分由术前的7.06±1.22分提高到1.06±1.07分,B组5年随访时视觉模拟量表评分由术前的7.5±0.92分提高到2.97±0.59分,P=0.000。同样,A组美国肩肘外科医生评分从术前26.64±8.15分提高到术后92.06±5.37分,B组从术前19.87±7.56分提高到术后77.1±5.40分(P=0.000)。A组恒积分由术前的20.44±2.66分提高到术后的92.91±3.64分,B组由术前的20.13±2.29分提高到80.53±4.76分(P=0.000)。最后随访时放射学评估显示,A组术前前后位(水平)位移为4.31±2.62,术后为1.06±1.01,B组术前为5.56±2.12,术后为3.41±1.29,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。A组的优势位移术前为21.57±5.09 mm,术后为10.61±1.02 mm,而B组的优势位移术前为23.99±5.92 mm,术后为13.36±3.67 mm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。结论与钩钢板固定相比,自体移植物对急性不稳定ACJ脱位的CC和AC韧带的解剖重建具有长期的功能效果和垂直和水平移动的力学稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are olecranon osteotomies preferred to triceps-elevating approaches in intraarticular distal humerus fractures? A literature review Comparative study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by strut laminar autograft versus cage in degenerative lumbar spine diseases Distal fibula locked plate versus nonlocked plate for treatment of Danis Weber type B fracture comparative prospective study Assessment of lateral malleolus weber C fractures’ outcomes in patients undergoing syndesmosis-only fixation versus syndesmosis and fibular fixation Anterior odontoid lag screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1