Evidence in Argumentation

D. Zarefsky
{"title":"Evidence in Argumentation","authors":"D. Zarefsky","doi":"10.1017/9781139540926.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When you advance an assertion in conversation with another person, that person might accept it immediately. Or the person might reject it out of hand, refusing even to listen to any more about it. Most reactions, however, fall somewhere between these two extremes. The other person is not yet satisfied that you are correct in what you assert but is willing to give the matter some more thought. Such a person might respond by asking, “What do you have to go on?” or “What makes you say so?” Questions of this sort are requests for evidence that will back up the assertion you have advanced. This chapter is concerned with evidence and its role in argumentation.","PeriodicalId":445828,"journal":{"name":"The Practice of Argumentation","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Practice of Argumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139540926.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When you advance an assertion in conversation with another person, that person might accept it immediately. Or the person might reject it out of hand, refusing even to listen to any more about it. Most reactions, however, fall somewhere between these two extremes. The other person is not yet satisfied that you are correct in what you assert but is willing to give the matter some more thought. Such a person might respond by asking, “What do you have to go on?” or “What makes you say so?” Questions of this sort are requests for evidence that will back up the assertion you have advanced. This chapter is concerned with evidence and its role in argumentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论证中的证据
当你在与另一个人的谈话中提出一个主张时,那个人可能会立即接受。或者这个人可能会立即拒绝它,甚至拒绝再听任何关于它的事情。然而,大多数人的反应介于这两个极端之间。另一个人还不满意你的断言是正确的,但愿意再多考虑一下。这样的人可能会问:“你有什么要做的?”或者“你为什么这么说?”这类问题是对证据的要求,以支持你所提出的主张。这一章关注的是证据及其在论证中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Emergence of Controversy Argument Schemes What Arguments Look Like Fallacies Case Construction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1