TYPOLOGY OF LEGAL RESEARCH METHODS IN NORMATIVE AND SOCIOLOGICAL THINKING

Ujang Charda S
{"title":"TYPOLOGY OF LEGAL RESEARCH METHODS IN NORMATIVE AND SOCIOLOGICAL THINKING","authors":"Ujang Charda S","doi":"10.58471/justi.v12i1.769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal Research Methods in understanding and exploring technical aspects of legal research in accordance with the peculiarities of legal science which has a dual paradigm, not only normative in character, but also with sociological empirical character. The research method used is descriptive analytical with a normative juridical approach through the literature and field research stages with data collection techniques through library research. Then the data were analyzed through a qualitative normative method without using numbers and mathematical formulas. Based on the results of the study, it shows that the dichotomy of the scientific paradigm of legal science has actually resulted in a lack of agreement among legal scientists regarding the legal research model that will be developed to answer various legal issues that arise in the life of the legal community. This dual legal scientific paradigm also ultimately creates confusion regarding the research model that will be developed when conducting legal research","PeriodicalId":351142,"journal":{"name":"Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v12i1.769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal Research Methods in understanding and exploring technical aspects of legal research in accordance with the peculiarities of legal science which has a dual paradigm, not only normative in character, but also with sociological empirical character. The research method used is descriptive analytical with a normative juridical approach through the literature and field research stages with data collection techniques through library research. Then the data were analyzed through a qualitative normative method without using numbers and mathematical formulas. Based on the results of the study, it shows that the dichotomy of the scientific paradigm of legal science has actually resulted in a lack of agreement among legal scientists regarding the legal research model that will be developed to answer various legal issues that arise in the life of the legal community. This dual legal scientific paradigm also ultimately creates confusion regarding the research model that will be developed when conducting legal research
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规范性和社会学思维中的法律研究方法类型学
法律研究方法是根据法学的特点来理解和探索法律研究的技术方面,具有双重范式,既具有规范性,又具有社会学的经验性。使用的研究方法是描述性分析与规范的法律途径,通过文献和实地研究阶段与数据收集技术,通过图书馆研究。在此基础上,不使用数字和数学公式,采用定性规范方法对数据进行分析。根据研究结果,它表明,法律科学范式的二分法实际上导致法律科学家对将发展的法律研究模式缺乏共识,该模式将回答法律界生活中出现的各种法律问题。这种双重的法学科学范式也最终造成了在进行法学研究时将发展的研究模式的混乱
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Parties In The Indonesian Political System After The Rolling Of Reforms JURIDICAL REVIEW ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING CRIMINAL ACTS (Decision Number : 801/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Lbp) SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL DISPUTES BETWEEN CUSTOMERS WITH BANK THROUGH BANKING MEDIATION (Case Study of Bank Al Washliyah Medan) REVIEW OF COVID-19 TASK CIRCULAR LETTER NUMBER 20 YEAR 2021 ON MANDATORY QUARANTINE POLICY AFTER TAKING INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE (STUDY ON TRAVEL HUB HOTEL) JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN DECIDING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CLASS 1 ARCOTIC ABUSE FOR YOURSELF (CASE STUDY Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Lbp PN LUBUK PAKAM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1