{"title":"Functions on surfaces and constructions of\n manifolds in dimensions three, four and five","authors":"David T. Gay","doi":"10.1090/pspum/102/06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We offer a new proof that two closed oriented 4–manifolds are cobordant if their signatures agree, in the spirit of Lickorish’s proof [6] that all closed oriented 3–manifolds bound 4–manifolds. Where Lickorish uses Heegaard splittings we use trisections. In fact we begin with a subtle recasting of Lickorish’s argument: Instead of factoring the gluing map for a Heegaard splitting as a product of Dehn twists, we encode each handlebody in a Heegaard splitting in terms of a Morse function on the surface and build the 4–manifold from a generic homotopy between the two functions. This extends up a dimension by encoding a trisection of a closed 4–manifold as a triangle (circle) of functions and constructing an associated 5– manifold from an extension to a 2–simplex (disk) of functions. This borrows ideas from Hatcher and Thurston’s proof [3] that the mapping class group of a surface is finitely presented.","PeriodicalId":384712,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Symposia in Pure\n Mathematics","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Symposia in Pure\n Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/pspum/102/06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
We offer a new proof that two closed oriented 4–manifolds are cobordant if their signatures agree, in the spirit of Lickorish’s proof [6] that all closed oriented 3–manifolds bound 4–manifolds. Where Lickorish uses Heegaard splittings we use trisections. In fact we begin with a subtle recasting of Lickorish’s argument: Instead of factoring the gluing map for a Heegaard splitting as a product of Dehn twists, we encode each handlebody in a Heegaard splitting in terms of a Morse function on the surface and build the 4–manifold from a generic homotopy between the two functions. This extends up a dimension by encoding a trisection of a closed 4–manifold as a triangle (circle) of functions and constructing an associated 5– manifold from an extension to a 2–simplex (disk) of functions. This borrows ideas from Hatcher and Thurston’s proof [3] that the mapping class group of a surface is finitely presented.