The Embedded Innovation Systems of Germany and Japan: Distinctive Features and Futures

R. Boyer
{"title":"The Embedded Innovation Systems of Germany and Japan: Distinctive Features and Futures","authors":"R. Boyer","doi":"10.7591/9781501711442-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why is it that Germany and Japan, economic miracles of the 60's are nowadays perceived as ailing capitalisms and should they adopt a typical American market led capitalism? Can the German and Japanese Social Systems of Innovation (SSI) survive into the next century? Does the opposition between embedded and market-led capitalism provide a satisfactory interpretation? The answers to the three previous questions are respectively no, yes, and no. The paper first provides an institutional and statistical analysis of the Social System of Innovation of major OECD countries, then builds a Kaldorian endogenous growth model which captures three sources for technical change, and finally, uses this framework in order to elaborate some scenarios for the transformation of the Japanese and German economies.","PeriodicalId":152889,"journal":{"name":"The End of Diversity?","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The End of Diversity?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711442-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Why is it that Germany and Japan, economic miracles of the 60's are nowadays perceived as ailing capitalisms and should they adopt a typical American market led capitalism? Can the German and Japanese Social Systems of Innovation (SSI) survive into the next century? Does the opposition between embedded and market-led capitalism provide a satisfactory interpretation? The answers to the three previous questions are respectively no, yes, and no. The paper first provides an institutional and statistical analysis of the Social System of Innovation of major OECD countries, then builds a Kaldorian endogenous growth model which captures three sources for technical change, and finally, uses this framework in order to elaborate some scenarios for the transformation of the Japanese and German economies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国和日本的嵌入式创新系统:各自的特点和未来
为什么德国和日本,60年代的经济奇迹,现在被认为是病态的资本主义,他们应该采用典型的美国市场主导的资本主义吗?德国和日本的社会创新体系(SSI)能否延续到下个世纪?嵌入式资本主义和市场主导的资本主义之间的对立提供了一个令人满意的解释吗?前面三个问题的答案分别是no, yes和no。本文首先对主要经合组织国家的社会创新系统进行了制度和统计分析,然后构建了一个卡尔多里安内生增长模型,该模型捕捉了技术变革的三个来源,最后,利用这个框架来阐述日本和德国经济转型的一些情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Germany and Japan in a New Phase of Capitalism: Confronting the Past and the Future From Banks to Markets: The Political Economy of Liberalization of the German and Japanese Financial Systems Frontmatter Competitive Party Democracy and Political-Economic Reform in Germany and Japan: Do Party Systems Make a Difference? Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1