Identity and Role of State-Owned Enterprises for the People’s Welfare Based on Article 33 of the Indonesian Constitution

Widhya Mahendra Putra, R. Lestarini
{"title":"Identity and Role of State-Owned Enterprises for the People’s Welfare Based on Article 33 of the Indonesian Constitution","authors":"Widhya Mahendra Putra, R. Lestarini","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.200321.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nature of the establishment of SOEs in Indonesia is derived from the formulation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution provides direction, intent and purpose for the state to control important production branches and to control the livelihoods of many people through state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The dynamics of politics, economy, and the era of globalization pushed changes in the management of SOEs. It is important to always look back at the background of the formation and identity of the actual SOEs so that the management and control of SOEs by the state remains in the corridor of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. This paper discusses the background of SOE formation that was influenced by ideological, economic and historical reasons. The development of SOEs from time to time shows that the influence of economic and political policies of the authorities is more dominant in influencing the management of SOEs. The identity and role of SOEs as agents of development, with business and social dimensions, demand that SOEs must be able to survive in the era of globalization amid demands from the state, society and the market. Faced with this, the government needs to separate explicitly between the actions of the state (government and the House of Representatives) and corporate actions (SOEs) so that management of SOEs can run professionally and be able to realize the objectives of the state.","PeriodicalId":245947,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance (ICLAVE 2019)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance (ICLAVE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200321.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nature of the establishment of SOEs in Indonesia is derived from the formulation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution provides direction, intent and purpose for the state to control important production branches and to control the livelihoods of many people through state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The dynamics of politics, economy, and the era of globalization pushed changes in the management of SOEs. It is important to always look back at the background of the formation and identity of the actual SOEs so that the management and control of SOEs by the state remains in the corridor of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. This paper discusses the background of SOE formation that was influenced by ideological, economic and historical reasons. The development of SOEs from time to time shows that the influence of economic and political policies of the authorities is more dominant in influencing the management of SOEs. The identity and role of SOEs as agents of development, with business and social dimensions, demand that SOEs must be able to survive in the era of globalization amid demands from the state, society and the market. Faced with this, the government needs to separate explicitly between the actions of the state (government and the House of Representatives) and corporate actions (SOEs) so that management of SOEs can run professionally and be able to realize the objectives of the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从印尼宪法第33条看国有企业为人民谋福利的身份和作用
在印度尼西亚建立国有企业的性质源于1945年宪法第33条的制定。1945年宪法第33条为国家控制重要的生产部门和通过国有企业控制许多人的生计提供了方向、意图和目的。政治、经济和全球化时代的变化推动了国有企业管理的变革。要始终回顾实际国有企业形成和认同的背景,使国家对国有企业的管理和控制停留在1945年《宪法》第33条的走廊上。本文论述了国有企业形成的背景,主要受思想、经济和历史因素的影响。国有企业的发展不时表明,当局的经济和政治政策对国有企业管理的影响更占主导地位。国有企业作为发展推动者的身份和角色,具有商业和社会层面,要求国有企业必须能够在国家、社会和市场的全球化要求中生存。面对这种情况,政府需要明确区分国家行为(政府和众议院)和企业行为(国有企业),使国有企业的管理能够专业化,能够实现国家的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Law and Human Right Protection of Outsourcing Labour Law Number 13 of 2003 Legal Protection for Customers in Information Technology-Based Financing with Sharia Principles (Study of PT Ammana Fintek Syariah) Initiating New Regulations on Personal Data Protection: Challenges for Personal Data Protection in Indonesia Legal and Human Rights Review of Fullfilment of Access to Justice: Considering the Elements of Legal Capability Regulation of Crypto Currency in World Trade Organization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1