Can Multi-channel Heart Sounds Analysis improve Murmur Detection?

D. Nogueira, J. Oliveira, Carlos Gomes Ferreira, M. Coimbra, A. Jorge
{"title":"Can Multi-channel Heart Sounds Analysis improve Murmur Detection?","authors":"D. Nogueira, J. Oliveira, Carlos Gomes Ferreira, M. Coimbra, A. Jorge","doi":"10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac auscultation is still the most cost-effective screening procedure for cardiovascular diseases. The development of computer assisted methods can empower a large variety of health professionals and thus enable mass cardiac health low-cost screening. The procedure for correct cardiac auscultation includes listening to the heart sounds of the four main auscultation spots. Until recently, attempts to develop automatic heart sound analysis methods that explore the multi-channel richness of a real auscultation, were very difficult due to the lack of adequate public datasets. In this work, we use the CirCor Dataset which is characterized by the existence of more than one heart sound per patient (each patient has heart sounds collected at different auscultation spots). Using this dataset, we evaluate and quantify the comparative impact of using a single or a multi-channel approach. A single channel approach uses the sound from a single auscultation spot, whereas a multi-channel approach uses four auscultation spots in an asynchronous way. From the different classifiers tested, models that use four auscultation spots achieved a higher overall performance than those that search for abnormalities in a single heart sound spot. Our best result is a multi-channel SVM that analyzes four auscultation spots, with an overall performance of 87,4%. This opens the path to future research using a multi-channel approach.","PeriodicalId":347210,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","volume":"2021 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac auscultation is still the most cost-effective screening procedure for cardiovascular diseases. The development of computer assisted methods can empower a large variety of health professionals and thus enable mass cardiac health low-cost screening. The procedure for correct cardiac auscultation includes listening to the heart sounds of the four main auscultation spots. Until recently, attempts to develop automatic heart sound analysis methods that explore the multi-channel richness of a real auscultation, were very difficult due to the lack of adequate public datasets. In this work, we use the CirCor Dataset which is characterized by the existence of more than one heart sound per patient (each patient has heart sounds collected at different auscultation spots). Using this dataset, we evaluate and quantify the comparative impact of using a single or a multi-channel approach. A single channel approach uses the sound from a single auscultation spot, whereas a multi-channel approach uses four auscultation spots in an asynchronous way. From the different classifiers tested, models that use four auscultation spots achieved a higher overall performance than those that search for abnormalities in a single heart sound spot. Our best result is a multi-channel SVM that analyzes four auscultation spots, with an overall performance of 87,4%. This opens the path to future research using a multi-channel approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多通道心音分析能改善杂音检测吗?
心脏听诊仍然是最具成本效益的心血管疾病筛查程序。计算机辅助方法的发展可以授权各种各样的卫生专业人员,从而使大规模心脏健康低成本筛查成为可能。正确的心脏听诊程序包括听四个主要听诊点的心音。直到最近,由于缺乏足够的公共数据集,试图开发探索真实听诊的多通道丰富性的自动心音分析方法非常困难。在这项工作中,我们使用了CirCor数据集,其特征是每个患者存在多个心音(每个患者在不同听诊点收集心音)。使用此数据集,我们评估和量化使用单一或多渠道方法的比较影响。单通道方法使用来自单个听诊点的声音,而多通道方法以异步方式使用四个听诊点。从测试的不同分类器来看,使用四个听诊点的模型比在单个心音点搜索异常的模型获得了更高的整体性能。我们最好的结果是分析四个听诊点的多通道SVM,总体性能为87.4%。这为未来使用多渠道方法进行研究开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BEBOP: Bidirectional dEep Brain cOnnectivity maPping Stabilizing Skeletal Pose Estimation using mmWave Radar via Dynamic Model and Filtering Behavioral Data Categorization for Transformers-based Models in Digital Health Gender Difference in Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Influence of Sensor Position and Body Movements on Radar-Based Heart Rate Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1