Two years and two hurricanes later: Did the dunes recover?

Shore & Beach Pub Date : 2020-12-12 DOI:10.34237/1008841
J. Ellis, Mayra A. Román-Rivera, M. Harris, Peter Terezkiewicz
{"title":"Two years and two hurricanes later: Did the dunes recover?","authors":"J. Ellis, Mayra A. Román-Rivera, M. Harris, Peter Terezkiewicz","doi":"10.34237/1008841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many places along the U.S. East and Gulf of Mexico coasts, barrier islands are the first line of defense against extreme weather events threatening our coastlines. The trademark of these barrier islands are sand dunes that are intricately bound, from a sedimentary perspective, to the beach. Coastal storms, such as Hurricanes Matthew (2016), Irma and Maria (2017), and Florence (2018) have devastating impacts on these environments. This study investigated the volumetric changes of an anthropogenic and controlled beach-dune system on Isle of Palms, South Carolina, for approximately one year following Hurricanes Matthew (2016) and Irma (2017). This research reveals that these systems did not recover. The average loss of sand at the beach was -15.5% (nv = -0.89), whereas the dunes gained an average of 13.3% (nv = 0.79), when compared to the already diminished post-storm volumes. When considering the pre-Hurricane Irma to pre-Hurricane Florence temporal period, the recovery percentages for the anthropogenic and control dunes was -15.5% and -40.1%, respectively, suggesting a net loss of sand. Cumulative storms, such as those experienced on the coast of South Carolina and many other coasts, pose a substantial threat to the long-term viability of coastal dune systems. However, recovery at the control site in the form of incipient foredune growth is promising. This paper concludes with a list of influencing factors to dune recovery.","PeriodicalId":153020,"journal":{"name":"Shore & Beach","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shore & Beach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In many places along the U.S. East and Gulf of Mexico coasts, barrier islands are the first line of defense against extreme weather events threatening our coastlines. The trademark of these barrier islands are sand dunes that are intricately bound, from a sedimentary perspective, to the beach. Coastal storms, such as Hurricanes Matthew (2016), Irma and Maria (2017), and Florence (2018) have devastating impacts on these environments. This study investigated the volumetric changes of an anthropogenic and controlled beach-dune system on Isle of Palms, South Carolina, for approximately one year following Hurricanes Matthew (2016) and Irma (2017). This research reveals that these systems did not recover. The average loss of sand at the beach was -15.5% (nv = -0.89), whereas the dunes gained an average of 13.3% (nv = 0.79), when compared to the already diminished post-storm volumes. When considering the pre-Hurricane Irma to pre-Hurricane Florence temporal period, the recovery percentages for the anthropogenic and control dunes was -15.5% and -40.1%, respectively, suggesting a net loss of sand. Cumulative storms, such as those experienced on the coast of South Carolina and many other coasts, pose a substantial threat to the long-term viability of coastal dune systems. However, recovery at the control site in the form of incipient foredune growth is promising. This paper concludes with a list of influencing factors to dune recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两年之后,两次飓风过后:沙丘恢复了吗?
在美国东部和墨西哥湾沿岸的许多地方,堰洲岛是抵御极端天气事件威胁我们海岸线的第一道防线。这些堰洲岛的标志是沙丘,从沉积的角度来看,它们与海滩紧密相连。沿海风暴,如飓风马修(2016年)、飓风伊尔玛和玛丽亚(2017年)以及佛罗伦萨(2018年),对这些环境产生了毁灭性的影响。本研究调查了在飓风马修(2016)和厄玛(2017)之后大约一年内,南卡罗来纳州棕榈岛人为和受控的海滩-沙丘系统的体积变化。这项研究表明,这些系统并没有恢复。与风暴后已经减少的沙量相比,海滩的平均沙损失为-15.5% (nv = -0.89),而沙丘的平均沙损失为13.3% (nv = 0.79)。在飓风前Irma至飓风前Florence期间,人为沙丘和控制沙丘的恢复百分比分别为-15.5%和-40.1%,表明沙的净损失。像南卡罗来纳海岸和许多其他海岸所经历的那样,累积的风暴对海岸沙丘系统的长期生存能力构成了重大威胁。然而,在控制部位以早期前丘生长的形式恢复是有希望的。最后,列举了影响沙丘恢复的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Online Materials: The impacts of climate change on surfing resources Engineering and design of the Lightning Point Shoreline Restoration Project in Bayou La Batre, Alabama Tidal marsh restoration at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland: A case study in thin-layer placement Thin layer placement for marsh enhancement: Planning, design, construction, and monitoring considerations Evaluating direct and strategic placement of dredged material for marsh restoration through model simulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1