Modeling Human Behaviour with Higher Order Logic: Insider Threats

J. Boender, M. Ivanova, F. Kammüller, G. Primiero
{"title":"Modeling Human Behaviour with Higher Order Logic: Insider Threats","authors":"J. Boender, M. Ivanova, F. Kammüller, G. Primiero","doi":"10.1109/STAST.2014.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we approach the problem of modeling the human component in technical systems with a view on the difference between the use of model and theory in sociology and computer science. One aim of this essay is to show that building of theories and models for sociology can be compared to and implemented in Higher Order Logic. We validate this working hypothesis by revisiting Weber's understanding explanation. We focus on constructive realism in the context of logical explanation. We review Higher Order Logic (HOL) as a foundation for computer science and summarize its use of theories relating it to the sociological process of logical explanation. As a case study on modeling human behaviour, we present the modeling and analysis of insider threats as a Higher Order Logic theory in Isabelle/HOL. We show how each of the three step process of sociological explanation can be seen in our modeling of insider's state, its context within an organisation and the effects on security as outcomes of a theorem proving analysis.","PeriodicalId":201239,"journal":{"name":"2014 Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAST.2014.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this paper, we approach the problem of modeling the human component in technical systems with a view on the difference between the use of model and theory in sociology and computer science. One aim of this essay is to show that building of theories and models for sociology can be compared to and implemented in Higher Order Logic. We validate this working hypothesis by revisiting Weber's understanding explanation. We focus on constructive realism in the context of logical explanation. We review Higher Order Logic (HOL) as a foundation for computer science and summarize its use of theories relating it to the sociological process of logical explanation. As a case study on modeling human behaviour, we present the modeling and analysis of insider threats as a Higher Order Logic theory in Isabelle/HOL. We show how each of the three step process of sociological explanation can be seen in our modeling of insider's state, its context within an organisation and the effects on security as outcomes of a theorem proving analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用高阶逻辑建模人类行为:内部威胁
在本文中,我们从社会学和计算机科学中模型和理论使用的区别的角度来探讨技术系统中人的组成部分的建模问题。本文的目的之一是表明社会学的理论和模型的建立可以与高阶逻辑进行比较和实施。我们通过重新审视韦伯的理解解释来验证这一工作假设。我们关注的是逻辑解释背景下的建设性现实主义。我们回顾了高阶逻辑(HOL)作为计算机科学的基础,并总结了与逻辑解释的社会学过程相关的理论。作为人类行为建模的案例研究,我们将内部威胁建模和分析作为Isabelle/HOL的高阶逻辑理论。我们展示了社会学解释的三步过程中的每一步是如何在我们的内部状态模型中被看到的,它在组织内的背景,以及作为定理证明分析的结果对安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Statistical Information to Communicate Android Permission Risks to Users Decision Justifications for Wireless Network Selection The Social Engineering Personality Framework What You Enter Is What You Sign: Input Integrity in an Online Banking Environment Reflecting on the Ability of Enterprise Security Policy to Address Accidental Insider Threat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1