Critical Information Studies: A Bibliographic Manifesto

S. Vaidhyanathan
{"title":"Critical Information Studies: A Bibliographic Manifesto","authors":"S. Vaidhyanathan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.788984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes measure of an emerging scholarly field that sits at the intersection of many important areas of study. Critical Information Studies (CIS) considers the ways that culture and information are regulated and their relationship to commerce, creativity, and other human affairs. CIS captures the variety of approaches and bodies of knowledge needed to make sense of interesting, important phenomena such as copyright policy, electronic voting, encryption, the state of libraries, the preservation of ancient cultural traditions, and markets for cultural production. It necessarily stretches to a wide array of scholarly subjects, employs multiple complementary methodologies, and influences conversations far beyond the gates of the university. This field can serve as a model for how engaged, relevant scholarship in other areas might be done. Economists, sociologists, linguists, anthropologists, ethnomusicologists, communication scholars, lawyers, computer scientists, philosophers, and librarians have all contributed to this field. CIS interrogates the structures, functions, habits, norms, and practices that guide global flows of information and cultural elements. Instead of being concerned merely with one's right to speak (or sing or publish), CIS asks questions about access, costs, and chilling effects on, within, and among audiences, citizens, emerging cultural creators, indigenous cultural groups, teachers, and students. Central to these issues is the idea of semiotic democracy, the ability of citizens to employ the signs and symbols ubiquitous in their environments in manners that they determine.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.788984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This paper takes measure of an emerging scholarly field that sits at the intersection of many important areas of study. Critical Information Studies (CIS) considers the ways that culture and information are regulated and their relationship to commerce, creativity, and other human affairs. CIS captures the variety of approaches and bodies of knowledge needed to make sense of interesting, important phenomena such as copyright policy, electronic voting, encryption, the state of libraries, the preservation of ancient cultural traditions, and markets for cultural production. It necessarily stretches to a wide array of scholarly subjects, employs multiple complementary methodologies, and influences conversations far beyond the gates of the university. This field can serve as a model for how engaged, relevant scholarship in other areas might be done. Economists, sociologists, linguists, anthropologists, ethnomusicologists, communication scholars, lawyers, computer scientists, philosophers, and librarians have all contributed to this field. CIS interrogates the structures, functions, habits, norms, and practices that guide global flows of information and cultural elements. Instead of being concerned merely with one's right to speak (or sing or publish), CIS asks questions about access, costs, and chilling effects on, within, and among audiences, citizens, emerging cultural creators, indigenous cultural groups, teachers, and students. Central to these issues is the idea of semiotic democracy, the ability of citizens to employ the signs and symbols ubiquitous in their environments in manners that they determine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判信息研究:书目宣言
这篇论文采取了一个新兴的学术领域,坐落在许多重要的研究领域的交叉点。关键信息研究(CIS)考虑的方式,文化和信息是规范和他们的关系,商业,创造力,和其他人类事务。CIS捕获了各种方法和知识体系,这些方法和知识体系需要理解有趣的、重要的现象,如版权政策、电子投票、加密、图书馆的状态、古代文化传统的保存和文化产品的市场。它必然延伸到广泛的学术主题,采用多种互补的方法,并影响远远超出大学大门的对话。这一领域可以作为其他领域从事相关学术研究的典范。经济学家、社会学家、语言学家、人类学家、民族音乐学家、传播学者、律师、计算机科学家、哲学家和图书馆员都对这一领域做出了贡献。CIS探究引导全球信息和文化元素流动的结构、功能、习惯、规范和实践。CIS不只关心一个人的话语权(或唱权或出版权),它还提出了关于获取、成本和对观众、公民、新兴文化创作者、土著文化群体、教师和学生的寒蝉效应等问题。这些问题的核心是符号民主的概念,即公民以自己决定的方式使用环境中无处不在的符号和符号的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lawyer Brain - Transform your Well-being and Develop a Performance Edge The Scholarly Impact Matrix: An Empirical Study of How Multiple Metrics Create an Informed Story of a Scholar's Work Law and Economics Under the Palms: Henry Manne at the University of Miami, 1974–1980 Curriculum Decolonisation and Revisionist Pedagogy of African Customary Law Правовое просвещение, электронная демократия и медиаобразование: основы эффективной интеграции (Legal Education, e-Democracy and Media Education: The Basis of Effective Integration)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1