Collaboration Tool Choices and Use in Remote Software Teams: Emerging Results from an Ongoing Study

Victoria Jackson, A. Hoek, R. Prikladnicki
{"title":"Collaboration Tool Choices and Use in Remote Software Teams: Emerging Results from an Ongoing Study","authors":"Victoria Jackson, A. Hoek, R. Prikladnicki","doi":"10.1145/3528579.3529171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, more software teams than ever find themselves working in a remote model with team members separated by location, timezone, and working hours. This working model is expected to persist post-pandemic as companies explore the benefits of hybrid working. Software teams have always been reliant on tools to help them build software. Now they find themselves wholly reliant on tools to help them collaborate online. Surprisingly, there has been little research to date on which collaboration tools are used, how they are chosen, how they are used, and what challenges are faced when using such tools. This short paper offers emerging findings from an ongoing study in which we are interviewing software professionals about these questions. The insights are preliminary in that we are still conducting additional interviews beyond the ones reported here, yet some common themes are already emerging. Among others, we highlight the following: choice of tools made by the teams is opportunistic; teams adapt existing collaboration practices to utilize the tools better when working remotely; and a persistent problem exists of being unable to find information across chats, emails, and documents.","PeriodicalId":418063,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 15th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","volume":"31 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 15th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3528579.3529171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, more software teams than ever find themselves working in a remote model with team members separated by location, timezone, and working hours. This working model is expected to persist post-pandemic as companies explore the benefits of hybrid working. Software teams have always been reliant on tools to help them build software. Now they find themselves wholly reliant on tools to help them collaborate online. Surprisingly, there has been little research to date on which collaboration tools are used, how they are chosen, how they are used, and what challenges are faced when using such tools. This short paper offers emerging findings from an ongoing study in which we are interviewing software professionals about these questions. The insights are preliminary in that we are still conducting additional interviews beyond the ones reported here, yet some common themes are already emerging. Among others, we highlight the following: choice of tools made by the teams is opportunistic; teams adapt existing collaboration practices to utilize the tools better when working remotely; and a persistent problem exists of being unable to find information across chats, emails, and documents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程软件团队中协作工具的选择和使用:一项正在进行的研究的新结果
由于COVID-19大流行,越来越多的软件团队发现自己在远程模式下工作,团队成员因位置、时区和工作时间而分开。随着企业探索混合工作的好处,这种工作模式预计将在大流行后持续存在。软件团队一直依赖于工具来帮助他们构建软件。现在,他们发现自己完全依赖于工具来帮助他们进行在线协作。令人惊讶的是,迄今为止很少有关于使用哪些协作工具、如何选择它们、如何使用它们以及在使用此类工具时面临哪些挑战的研究。这篇短文提供了一项正在进行的研究的新发现,我们正在就这些问题采访软件专业人员。这些见解是初步的,因为我们仍在进行更多的采访,但一些共同的主题已经出现。其中,我们强调以下几点:团队选择的工具是机会主义的;团队调整现有的协作实践,以便在远程工作时更好地利用工具;并且存在一个长期存在的问题,即无法在聊天、电子邮件和文档中找到信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
So who is impacted anyway - a preliminary study of indirect stakeholder identification in practice Pandemic Agility: Towards a theory on adapting to working from home Seeking New Measures for Gender Bias Effects in Open-Source Software How developers feel about tools: an investigation on software startup professionals experience with virtual kanban boards A Framework for Class Activities to Cultivate Responsible Leadership in Software Engineering Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1