Clinical Characteristics are Not Significant Predictors of Advanced Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Severely Obese

L. Benoit, A. Malhotra, J. Sebastian, C. Agborsangaya, M. Bhutani, R. Padwal
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics are Not Significant Predictors of Advanced Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Severely Obese","authors":"L. Benoit, A. Malhotra, J. Sebastian, C. Agborsangaya, M. Bhutani, R. Padwal","doi":"10.4172/2165-7904.1000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), present in 30-93% of bariatric patients, is an independent predictor of post-bariatric surgery complications. Universal screening with Polysomnography (PSG), the gold \nstandard test for OSA, would be difficult to access and costly to perform. The purpose of this study was to identify clinically important, statistically significant predictors of moderate-to-severe OSA in a bariatric population that would enable providers to stratify or prioritize patients needing PSG. \nMethods: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients referred for clinical suspicion of OSA. All patients underwent PSG. From a list of potential covariates deemed clinically important, multivariable binary logistic regression was used to identify statistically significant predictors (p<0.05) of moderate-to-severe OSA. Subjects were recruited from a bariatric specialty program in Edmonton, Alberta, with a central, region-wide, single-point-ofaccess referral system. \nResults: Of 169 patients undergoing PSG, 161 (95.3%) had complete data. Mean age was 48.7 ± 9.1 years, \n45(28%) were men, mean body mass index (BMI) was 49.5 ± 9.7 kg/m2. 96(60%) patients had moderate-to-severe OSA and the mean Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was 27.0 ± 27.3. The strongest predictors of OSA were neck circumference (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99-1.18) and hypertension (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.93-4.09). However, no variable reached statistical significance. \nConclusion: Despite a model adequately powered to identify 16-32 statistically significant predictors, none was found. Given the high prevalence of OSA in patients undergoing bariatric care, the lack of identifiable predictors mandates that objective sleep testing be performed in all patients clinically suspected to have OSA.","PeriodicalId":243288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obesity and weight loss therapy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obesity and weight loss therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.1000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), present in 30-93% of bariatric patients, is an independent predictor of post-bariatric surgery complications. Universal screening with Polysomnography (PSG), the gold standard test for OSA, would be difficult to access and costly to perform. The purpose of this study was to identify clinically important, statistically significant predictors of moderate-to-severe OSA in a bariatric population that would enable providers to stratify or prioritize patients needing PSG. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients referred for clinical suspicion of OSA. All patients underwent PSG. From a list of potential covariates deemed clinically important, multivariable binary logistic regression was used to identify statistically significant predictors (p<0.05) of moderate-to-severe OSA. Subjects were recruited from a bariatric specialty program in Edmonton, Alberta, with a central, region-wide, single-point-ofaccess referral system. Results: Of 169 patients undergoing PSG, 161 (95.3%) had complete data. Mean age was 48.7 ± 9.1 years, 45(28%) were men, mean body mass index (BMI) was 49.5 ± 9.7 kg/m2. 96(60%) patients had moderate-to-severe OSA and the mean Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was 27.0 ± 27.3. The strongest predictors of OSA were neck circumference (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99-1.18) and hypertension (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.93-4.09). However, no variable reached statistical significance. Conclusion: Despite a model adequately powered to identify 16-32 statistically significant predictors, none was found. Given the high prevalence of OSA in patients undergoing bariatric care, the lack of identifiable predictors mandates that objective sleep testing be performed in all patients clinically suspected to have OSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床特征不是重度肥胖患者晚期阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的显著预测因素
梗阻性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)存在于30-93%的肥胖患者中,是减肥手术后并发症的独立预测因子。多导睡眠图(PSG)是OSA的金标准测试,但它很难获得,而且费用昂贵。本研究的目的是确定在肥胖人群中临床上重要的、有统计学意义的中度至重度OSA预测因素,使提供者能够对需要PSG的患者进行分层或优先排序。方法:对临床怀疑为OSA的患者进行横断面研究。所有患者均行PSG检查。从被认为具有临床重要性的潜在协变量列表中,采用多变量二元逻辑回归来确定中重度OSA的有统计学意义的预测因子(p<0.05)。受试者是从艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿的一个肥胖专业项目中招募的,该项目有一个中央的、区域性的、单点就诊的转诊系统。结果:169例患者行PSG, 161例(95.3%)资料完整。平均年龄48.7±9.1岁,男性45例(28%),平均体重指数(BMI) 49.5±9.7 kg/m2。96例(60%)患者为中重度OSA,平均呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)为27.0±27.3。OSA的最强预测因子是颈围(OR 1.08;(95% CI 0.99-1.18)和高血压(OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.93-4.09)。然而,没有变量达到统计学意义。结论:尽管有一个模型足以识别16-32个具有统计学意义的预测因子,但没有发现。考虑到接受减肥治疗的患者中OSA的高患病率,缺乏可识别的预测因素,要求对所有临床怀疑患有OSA的患者进行客观的睡眠测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenging physical impossibility: Finding your way to change using your body and spirit Updated prevalence rate of obesity in 2 to 19 years old children in the United States - preventative lessons learned: A systematic review Obesity a global paradigm: Do ethnic variations have an impact? The associations of obesity with cardiometabolic risks and stress among multi-ethnic women in a developing country Management of Acute Bleeding Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1