Call & Put Butterfly Spreads Test of SET50 Index Options Market Efficiency and SET50 Index Options Contract Adjustment

W. Jongadsayakul
{"title":"Call & Put Butterfly Spreads Test of SET50 Index Options Market Efficiency and SET50 Index Options Contract Adjustment","authors":"W. Jongadsayakul","doi":"10.18178/IJTEF.2018.9.3.597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract—This paper tests the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market and investigates the impact of contract adjustment on market efficiency. The options data set I employ to conduct call & put butterfly spreads test of market efficiency covers the period from October 29, 2007 to December 30, 2016. When I ignore transaction costs, the results report frequent and substantial violations of pricing relationships. For an option maturing within 90 days, size of violations tends to be higher for options farther from the money or further away from expiration. Almost no violations remain after considering the bid-ask spread as transaction costs. Therefore, our results support the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market before and after the modification of contract specification. Comparing the results before and after contract adjustment, I do not observe any improvement of market efficiency after the modification of contract.","PeriodicalId":381210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/IJTEF.2018.9.3.597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract—This paper tests the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market and investigates the impact of contract adjustment on market efficiency. The options data set I employ to conduct call & put butterfly spreads test of market efficiency covers the period from October 29, 2007 to December 30, 2016. When I ignore transaction costs, the results report frequent and substantial violations of pricing relationships. For an option maturing within 90 days, size of violations tends to be higher for options farther from the money or further away from expiration. Almost no violations remain after considering the bid-ask spread as transaction costs. Therefore, our results support the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market before and after the modification of contract specification. Comparing the results before and after contract adjustment, I do not observe any improvement of market efficiency after the modification of contract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SET50指数期权市场效率和SET50指数期权合约调整的看涨和看跌蝶式价差检验
摘要本文对SET50指数期权市场的效率进行了检验,并考察了合约调整对市场效率的影响。我使用期权数据集进行看涨和看跌蝶式价差市场效率检验,涵盖的时间段为2007年10月29日至2016年12月30日。当我忽略交易成本时,结果会报告频繁且实质性地违反定价关系。对于在90天内到期的期权,期权的违约规模往往越大,期权离资金越远,或离到期日越远。将买卖价差作为交易成本考虑后,几乎不存在违规行为。因此,我们的研究结果支持SET50指数期权市场在合约规范修改前后的效率。对比合同调整前后的结果,我没有观察到合同修改后市场效率有任何提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Lean Service-Digital Marketing Model to Increase the Profitability of Debit Cards in Retail Banking Burden of Leverage: How Leverage Affects Performance of Companies in America Relationships between Live-streaming e-Commerce and Consumers’ Purchase Intentions and Corporate Brand Marketing: A Survey Based on China An Attention Based Multi-gate Mixture-of-Experts Model for Quantitative Stock Selection Tourism Firm Performance on Economic Risk and Return in Malaysia under Climate Change Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1