Clinical Validation Testing Of An Upper Limb Robotic Medical Education Training Simulator For Rigidity Assessment

Maxine He, Mahshid Mansouri, Yinan Pei, Isaac Pedroza, Christopher M. Zallek, E. Hsiao-Wecksler
{"title":"Clinical Validation Testing Of An Upper Limb Robotic Medical Education Training Simulator For Rigidity Assessment","authors":"Maxine He, Mahshid Mansouri, Yinan Pei, Isaac Pedroza, Christopher M. Zallek, E. Hsiao-Wecksler","doi":"10.1115/dmd2022-1073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An upper limb robotic training simulator was developed to replicate the haptic feeling of lead-pipe rigidity of the biceps. Rigidity is the increased muscle tone observed during passive movement of a joint. To validate the realism of our training simulator, a clinical validation study was conducted with 11 experienced clinicians. Testing involved two parts: Blinded Assessment followed by Disclosed Assessment. There were 12 randomized trials (4 levels of rigidity with 3 repetitions each) in the Blind Assessment. The participants were asked to rate the rigidity level using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in each trial without knowing the selected UPDRS level. During the Disclosed Assessment, participants were informed about the selected level and were asked to closely evaluate the fidelity of each UPDRS level. Participants completed a post-test evaluation questionnaire to rate the simulator’s accuracy in replicating rigidity and its potential as a medical education tool for healthcare students. Results from the first six participants indicated that the simulated muscle resistance magnitude was too high compared to their clinical experience. Therefore, the resistance magnitude was reduced for all 4 UPDRS levels. The second set of five participants reported that the training simulator closely replicated the UPDRS levels of rigidity compared to their clinical experience.","PeriodicalId":236105,"journal":{"name":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2022-1073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An upper limb robotic training simulator was developed to replicate the haptic feeling of lead-pipe rigidity of the biceps. Rigidity is the increased muscle tone observed during passive movement of a joint. To validate the realism of our training simulator, a clinical validation study was conducted with 11 experienced clinicians. Testing involved two parts: Blinded Assessment followed by Disclosed Assessment. There were 12 randomized trials (4 levels of rigidity with 3 repetitions each) in the Blind Assessment. The participants were asked to rate the rigidity level using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in each trial without knowing the selected UPDRS level. During the Disclosed Assessment, participants were informed about the selected level and were asked to closely evaluate the fidelity of each UPDRS level. Participants completed a post-test evaluation questionnaire to rate the simulator’s accuracy in replicating rigidity and its potential as a medical education tool for healthcare students. Results from the first six participants indicated that the simulated muscle resistance magnitude was too high compared to their clinical experience. Therefore, the resistance magnitude was reduced for all 4 UPDRS levels. The second set of five participants reported that the training simulator closely replicated the UPDRS levels of rigidity compared to their clinical experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于刚度评估的上肢机器人医学教育训练模拟器的临床验证试验
为了模拟二头肌的铅管刚性的触感,研制了上肢机器人训练模拟器。僵硬是指在关节被动运动时观察到的肌肉张力增加。为了验证我们的训练模拟器的真实性,对11名有经验的临床医生进行了临床验证研究。测试包括两部分:盲法评估和公开评估。盲法评估共有12项随机试验(4个等级,每个等级重复3次)。在不知道所选择的UPDRS水平的情况下,要求参与者在每个试验中使用统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)对刚性水平进行评分。在公开评估期间,参与者被告知所选择的水平,并被要求密切评估每个UPDRS水平的保真度。参与者完成了一份测试后评估问卷,以评估模拟器在复制刚性方面的准确性及其作为医疗保健学生医学教育工具的潜力。前六名参与者的结果表明,与他们的临床经验相比,模拟肌肉阻力幅度过高。因此,所有4个UPDRS水平的阻值都降低了。第二组五名参与者报告说,与他们的临床经验相比,训练模拟器非常接近地复制了UPDRS的刚性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communicating Cybersecurity and Privacy Design Attributes through Privacy Labeling of Consumer Electronic Medical Devices A Novel Tool for Auricle Retraction During Closure of Post-Auricular Incisions Development and Characterization of Biostable Hydrogel Robotic Actuators for Implantable Devices: Tendon Actuated Gelatin Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis to Expedite Treatment and Prevent Pulmonary Embolism During Gestation Development of an Epicardial Mapping Tank for Noninvasive Electrical Mapping of Ex Vivo Large Mammalian Hearts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1