Reply to Dr Martin's Letter Regarding Differences in Cognitive Outcomes After ECT Depending on BDNF and COMT Polymorphisms.

Daniel M. Bennett, J. Perrin, Gordon Fernie
{"title":"Reply to Dr Martin's Letter Regarding Differences in Cognitive Outcomes After ECT Depending on BDNF and COMT Polymorphisms.","authors":"Daniel M. Bennett, J. Perrin, Gordon Fernie","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor: B ennett and colleagues recently examined the effects of both the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met singlenucleotide polymorphism and catecholO-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism cognitive and mood outcomes after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Their study included 87 depressed patients, and cognitive functioning was tested at multiple time points (preECT, after 4 treatments, post-ECT, 1 month post-ECT, and 3 months post-ECT) with 2 tasks, the Mini-Mental State Examination and Spatial Recognition Memory from the CANTAB computerized battery. The authors suggested that assessing either of these polymorphisms will not be helpful for predicting cognitive outcomes after ECT in clinical practice. In a larger sample, we similarly had investigated the effects of both these polymorphisms, in addition to other potentially relevant genes, for predicting cognitive and mood outcomes after ECT. However, in contrast to Bennett et al, we administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, which included measures of both anterograde memory (learning and delayed recall) and retrograde autobiographical memory, the cognitive functions most affected by ECT. Our results showed effects ofCOMTVal158Met on change in retrograde autobiographical memory (P = 0.048, η = 0.055) and BDNF Val66Met on change in anterograde memory functioning (P = 0.026, η = 0.043) from preto post-ECT in unadjusted models. However, these effects were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for relevant covariates. Notwithstanding, it is possible that these effects may still hold true in a larger sample because our sample (N = 117) was modest for a gene association study, a limitation we acknowledged. Although the Spatial Recognition Memory test used by Bennett and colleagues also assessed anterograde memory (visuospatial), it did not assess delayed recall,","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editor: B ennett and colleagues recently examined the effects of both the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met singlenucleotide polymorphism and catecholO-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism cognitive and mood outcomes after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Their study included 87 depressed patients, and cognitive functioning was tested at multiple time points (preECT, after 4 treatments, post-ECT, 1 month post-ECT, and 3 months post-ECT) with 2 tasks, the Mini-Mental State Examination and Spatial Recognition Memory from the CANTAB computerized battery. The authors suggested that assessing either of these polymorphisms will not be helpful for predicting cognitive outcomes after ECT in clinical practice. In a larger sample, we similarly had investigated the effects of both these polymorphisms, in addition to other potentially relevant genes, for predicting cognitive and mood outcomes after ECT. However, in contrast to Bennett et al, we administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, which included measures of both anterograde memory (learning and delayed recall) and retrograde autobiographical memory, the cognitive functions most affected by ECT. Our results showed effects ofCOMTVal158Met on change in retrograde autobiographical memory (P = 0.048, η = 0.055) and BDNF Val66Met on change in anterograde memory functioning (P = 0.026, η = 0.043) from preto post-ECT in unadjusted models. However, these effects were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for relevant covariates. Notwithstanding, it is possible that these effects may still hold true in a larger sample because our sample (N = 117) was modest for a gene association study, a limitation we acknowledged. Although the Spatial Recognition Memory test used by Bennett and colleagues also assessed anterograde memory (visuospatial), it did not assess delayed recall,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回复Martin博士关于脑源性神经营养因子和COMT多态性在ECT后认知结果差异的信。
致编辑:B ennett及其同事最近研究了脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF) Val66Met单核苷酸多态性和儿茶酚甲基转移酶(COMT) Val158Met单核苷酸多态性对电休克治疗(ECT)后认知和情绪结果的影响。他们的研究包括87名抑郁症患者,在多个时间点(ect前,4次治疗后,ect后,ect后1个月,ect后3个月)测试认知功能,包括2个任务,迷你精神状态检查和CANTAB计算机化电池的空间识别记忆。作者认为,在临床实践中,评估这些多态性中的任何一种都无助于预测ECT后的认知结果。在一个更大的样本中,我们同样研究了这两种多态性的影响,以及其他潜在的相关基因,以预测ECT后的认知和情绪结果。然而,与Bennett等人不同的是,我们采用了一种全面的神经心理学方法,包括对逆行记忆(学习和延迟回忆)和逆行自传体记忆的测量,后者是受电痉挛疗法影响最大的认知功能。我们的研究结果显示,comtval158met对未调整模型中ect前后逆行自传体记忆的改变(P = 0.048, η = 0.055)和BDNF Val66Met对逆行记忆功能的改变(P = 0.026, η = 0.043)有影响。然而,在调整相关协变量后,这些影响不再具有统计学意义。尽管如此,这些影响可能在更大的样本中仍然成立,因为我们的样本(N = 117)对于基因关联研究来说是适度的,我们承认这是一个局限性。虽然班尼特和同事使用的空间识别记忆测试也评估了顺行记忆(视觉空间),但它没有评估延迟回忆,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why You Should Collect Routine Clinical Data for ECT: A Singapore Story From the CARE Network. Extreme Agitation in Mania Treated With Intravenous Continuous Infusion of Dexmedetomidine and ECT. Availability of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Public Health Services in the Last Decade in Brazil Psychotropic Medication Effects on Seizure Threshold and Seizure Duration During Electroconvulsive Therapy Stimulus Titration Review Leerboek Elektroconvulsietherapie: Editors: Verwey, B, van Waarde J. Uitgeverij Boom|de Tijdstroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1