Schematic Structure, Hebbian Learning, and Semantic Change

Vsevolod Kapatsinski
{"title":"Schematic Structure, Hebbian Learning, and Semantic Change","authors":"Vsevolod Kapatsinski","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/9780262037860.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to explain some trends in semantic change with Hebbian learning. Semantic broadening observed in grammaticalization is argued to be seeded by speakers when they select frequent forms for production over less accessible competitors, even though the meaning they are trying to express is merely similar to the meanings the frequent form was experienced in. Extension of frequent forms in production co-exists with entrenchment (the suspicious coincidence effect) in comprehension. The entrenchment effect in comprehension rules out a habituation account of the semantic change. The form a speaker is most likely to extend to a new meaning in production is often the form they are least likely to map onto that meaning in comprehension. A range of Hebbian models of these processes is developed. All such models are shown to predict the comprehension-production dissociation under default assumptions regarding salience differences between absent and present cues. Certain aspects of the results are shown to be problematic for error-driven models (Rescorla-Wagner), at least if learning rate is fast enough to give rise to their signature blocking effect. Finally, an account of accessibility in an associative framework is developed.","PeriodicalId":142675,"journal":{"name":"Changing Minds Changing Tools","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing Minds Changing Tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037860.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter aims to explain some trends in semantic change with Hebbian learning. Semantic broadening observed in grammaticalization is argued to be seeded by speakers when they select frequent forms for production over less accessible competitors, even though the meaning they are trying to express is merely similar to the meanings the frequent form was experienced in. Extension of frequent forms in production co-exists with entrenchment (the suspicious coincidence effect) in comprehension. The entrenchment effect in comprehension rules out a habituation account of the semantic change. The form a speaker is most likely to extend to a new meaning in production is often the form they are least likely to map onto that meaning in comprehension. A range of Hebbian models of these processes is developed. All such models are shown to predict the comprehension-production dissociation under default assumptions regarding salience differences between absent and present cues. Certain aspects of the results are shown to be problematic for error-driven models (Rescorla-Wagner), at least if learning rate is fast enough to give rise to their signature blocking effect. Finally, an account of accessibility in an associative framework is developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图式结构、希伯来语学习与语义变化
本章旨在解释Hebbian学习中语义变化的一些趋势。在语法化中观察到的语义扩展被认为是由说话者在选择频繁形式而不是不易接近的竞争者时播下的种子,即使他们试图表达的意思与频繁形式所经历的意思相似。生产中频繁形式的延伸与理解中的堑壕(可疑的巧合效应)共存。理解中的巩固效应排除了语义变化的习惯化解释。说话者在生产中最有可能扩展到新意义的形式,往往是他们在理解中最不可能映射到该意义上的形式。开发了这些过程的一系列Hebbian模型。所有这些模型都被证明可以在默认假设下预测关于缺席和在场线索之间显著性差异的理解-生产分离。结果的某些方面对于错误驱动的模型来说是有问题的(Rescorla-Wagner),至少如果学习率足够快,足以产生它们的标志性阻塞效应。最后,提出了一种联想框架下的可访问性描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bringing It All Together From Associative Learning to Language Structure Automatization and Sound Change Bayes, Rationality, and Rashionality The Web in the Spider: Associative Learning Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1