A systematic assessment of a cochlear implant processor's ability to encode interaural time differences

A. Kan, Z. Peng, K. Moua, R. Litovsky
{"title":"A systematic assessment of a cochlear implant processor's ability to encode interaural time differences","authors":"A. Kan, Z. Peng, K. Moua, R. Litovsky","doi":"10.23919/APSIPA.2018.8659694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bilateral cochlear implantation is becoming the standard of care for patients with sensorineural hearing loss with demonstrated improvements over unilateral use in everyday tasks, such as sound localization ability. However, even with bilateral implantation, performance in these tasks is still poorer than that of normal hearing listeners. The gap in performance has often been attributed to the poor encoding of fine structure interaural time differences (ITDs) by clinical processor. However, in theory, the signal processing employed in clinical processors should still encode envelope ITDs with some degree of fidelity. In this work, we quantitatively measured the ability of Cochlear CP910 processors to encode envelope ITDs, while running the Advanced Combinational Encoder (ACE) strategy. Results suggest that while the processors are able to support relatively good envelope encoding, the peak-picking approach of the ACE strategy degrades the computation of ITDs by encoding spectral information in different frequency regions in the two ears. Our results may explain the poorer sound localization performance observed in cochlear implant users who use the ACE strategy, but cannot account for the poorer sound localization performance observed in cochlear implant users in general.","PeriodicalId":287799,"journal":{"name":"2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/APSIPA.2018.8659694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implantation is becoming the standard of care for patients with sensorineural hearing loss with demonstrated improvements over unilateral use in everyday tasks, such as sound localization ability. However, even with bilateral implantation, performance in these tasks is still poorer than that of normal hearing listeners. The gap in performance has often been attributed to the poor encoding of fine structure interaural time differences (ITDs) by clinical processor. However, in theory, the signal processing employed in clinical processors should still encode envelope ITDs with some degree of fidelity. In this work, we quantitatively measured the ability of Cochlear CP910 processors to encode envelope ITDs, while running the Advanced Combinational Encoder (ACE) strategy. Results suggest that while the processors are able to support relatively good envelope encoding, the peak-picking approach of the ACE strategy degrades the computation of ITDs by encoding spectral information in different frequency regions in the two ears. Our results may explain the poorer sound localization performance observed in cochlear implant users who use the ACE strategy, but cannot account for the poorer sound localization performance observed in cochlear implant users in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对人工耳蜗处理器对耳际时差进行编码能力的系统评估
双侧人工耳蜗植入术正成为感音神经性听力损失患者的标准治疗方法,与单侧使用相比,双侧人工耳蜗植入术在日常工作中(如声音定位能力)有明显改善。然而,即使双侧植入,在这些任务中的表现仍然不如正常听力的听者。这种性能上的差距通常是由于临床处理器对精细结构间时差(ITDs)编码不佳造成的。然而,理论上,临床处理器所采用的信号处理仍应以一定程度的保真度对包络图进行编码。在这项工作中,我们定量测量了Cochlear CP910处理器在运行高级组合编码器(ACE)策略时编码包络过渡段的能力。结果表明,虽然处理器能够支持相对较好的包络编码,但ACE策略的拾峰方法通过编码两耳不同频率区域的频谱信息来降低过渡段的计算。我们的研究结果可以解释在使用ACE策略的人工耳蜗使用者中观察到的较差的声音定位表现,但不能解释在一般人工耳蜗使用者中观察到的较差的声音定位表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epileptic Focus Localization Based on iEEG by Using Positive Unlabeled (PU) Learning Image Retrieval using CNN and Low-level Feature Fusion for Crime Scene Investigation Image Database Privacy-Preserving SVM Computing in the Encrypted Domain Graphical User Interface for Medical Deep Learning - Application to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Statistical-Mechanical Analysis of the Second-Order Adaptive Volterra Filter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1