Engels’ Dialectics of—Human Activity in—Nature

Siyaveş Azeri
{"title":"Engels’ Dialectics of—Human Activity in—Nature","authors":"Siyaveş Azeri","doi":"10.56063/ms.2201.01105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Several Marxist theorists criticize Engels for his supposed non-dialectical and non-philosophical conceptualization of “praxis,” which, according to Lukacs, amounts to Engels’ alleged misunderstanding of Kantian “thing-in-itself.” I argue that such “criticisms” of Engels is based on a dualistic understanding of practical vs. theoretical. Contrary to the critiques’ allegations, Engels provides an account of prax-is/labour as a philosophical category that is truthful to Marx’s and his own earlier efforts for constituting a materialist dialectics—one that anticipates the concept of “human activity” elaborated particularly in philosophical works of Evald Ilyenkov and psychological studies of Lev Vygotsky. According to Engels, the so-called laws of dialectics are historical thus depending on human activity as it is “with man [that] we enter history.” Furthermore, it is through labour (the highest form of human activity) that not only the human hands but also social humanity and human consciousness have been constituted. Thus, laws of dialectics are the most general laws of human activity in social nature. Engels, truthful to Marx’s materialist method, prioritizes action over substance.","PeriodicalId":197031,"journal":{"name":"Marxism & Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marxism & Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56063/ms.2201.01105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Several Marxist theorists criticize Engels for his supposed non-dialectical and non-philosophical conceptualization of “praxis,” which, according to Lukacs, amounts to Engels’ alleged misunderstanding of Kantian “thing-in-itself.” I argue that such “criticisms” of Engels is based on a dualistic understanding of practical vs. theoretical. Contrary to the critiques’ allegations, Engels provides an account of prax-is/labour as a philosophical category that is truthful to Marx’s and his own earlier efforts for constituting a materialist dialectics—one that anticipates the concept of “human activity” elaborated particularly in philosophical works of Evald Ilyenkov and psychological studies of Lev Vygotsky. According to Engels, the so-called laws of dialectics are historical thus depending on human activity as it is “with man [that] we enter history.” Furthermore, it is through labour (the highest form of human activity) that not only the human hands but also social humanity and human consciousness have been constituted. Thus, laws of dialectics are the most general laws of human activity in social nature. Engels, truthful to Marx’s materialist method, prioritizes action over substance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恩格斯关于人在自然中的活动的辩证法
一些马克思主义理论家批评恩格斯所谓的非辩证和非哲学的“实践”概念化,根据卢卡奇的说法,这相当于恩格斯所谓的对康德“自在之物”的误解。我认为,这种对恩格斯的“批评”是基于对实践与理论的二元理解。与批评的说法相反,恩格斯提供了一个关于实践是/劳动的哲学范畴的描述,这与马克思和他自己早期构建唯物辩证法的努力是真实的——唯物辩证法预测了“人类活动”的概念,特别是在伊莱德·伊连科夫的哲学著作和列夫·维果茨基的心理学研究中得到了详细阐述。恩格斯认为,所谓辩证法的规律是历史性的,因此取决于人的活动,因为“我们是随着人进入历史的”。此外,正是通过劳动(人类活动的最高形式),不仅人类的双手,而且社会人性和人类意识也得以构成。因此,辩证法规律是人类在社会自然界中活动的最普遍的规律。恩格斯忠实于马克思的唯物主义方法,把行动置于物质之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foundations of Marxism and Ilyenkovian Contributions: “The Ambulance of Theory Arrived on the Scene Much Too Late” Bastard Homosapiens or Universal Emancipation? An Evening with Evald Ilyenkov From Object to Meaning: The Circle Interviews: Rethinking the Foundations of Marxism and Ilyenkovian Contributions Homo Datum and Socialized Cybernetics: Emerging Contours of the Latest Phase of Capitalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1