Trust and Tax Principles: A Dutch Case Study

Sonja Dusarduijn
{"title":"Trust and Tax Principles: A Dutch Case Study","authors":"Sonja Dusarduijn","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3315433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In addition to the procedural fairness of tax authorities, the legislative level is also of utmost importance for the degree of trust of citizens in taxation. This trust is grounded in the perception of the fairness and justice of the tax law and as such is closely related to the quality of this legislation. Legal principles, the normative core of a value-oriented conception of (tax) law, function as essential criteria of this quality of tax legislation. Trust in taxation thus requires the tax legislator to respect the three core principles of tax legislation – equality, certainty and clarity – as these principles reflect basic societal values. The lack of sufficient respect of the legislator for these principles have been found to influence the extent to which tax legislation is perceived as (un)fair by citizens. After having described these generally accepted principles of good tax law, the importance of these principles for the trust in tax legislation will subsequently be illustrated by testing the legislative quality of the current rules for taxing capital income. This article concludes with a plea to legislators for enhancing the respect for the underlying principles of law to warrant citizens trust in taxation.","PeriodicalId":121229,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: National eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: National eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3315433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In addition to the procedural fairness of tax authorities, the legislative level is also of utmost importance for the degree of trust of citizens in taxation. This trust is grounded in the perception of the fairness and justice of the tax law and as such is closely related to the quality of this legislation. Legal principles, the normative core of a value-oriented conception of (tax) law, function as essential criteria of this quality of tax legislation. Trust in taxation thus requires the tax legislator to respect the three core principles of tax legislation – equality, certainty and clarity – as these principles reflect basic societal values. The lack of sufficient respect of the legislator for these principles have been found to influence the extent to which tax legislation is perceived as (un)fair by citizens. After having described these generally accepted principles of good tax law, the importance of these principles for the trust in tax legislation will subsequently be illustrated by testing the legislative quality of the current rules for taxing capital income. This article concludes with a plea to legislators for enhancing the respect for the underlying principles of law to warrant citizens trust in taxation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信托与税收原则:荷兰案例研究
除了税务机关的程序公平外,立法层面对公民对税收的信任程度也至关重要。这种信任是基于对税法的公平和正义的认识,因此与这项立法的质量密切相关。法律原则是价值导向的税收法律观念的规范性核心,是衡量税收立法质量的基本标准。因此,对税收的信任要求税收立法者尊重税收立法的三个核心原则-平等,确定性和清晰度-因为这些原则反映了基本的社会价值观。人们发现,立法者对这些原则缺乏足够的尊重,影响了公民认为税收立法(不)公平的程度。在描述了这些普遍接受的良好税法原则之后,这些原则对税收立法信任的重要性随后将通过测试当前资本收入征税规则的立法质量来说明。本文最后恳请立法者加强对法律基本原则的尊重,以保证公民对税收的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Metering Interoperability Issues and Solutions: Taking Inspiration from Other Ecosystems and Sectors COVID-19 Vaccination and Data Protection Issues: A European Comparative Study With Focuses on France, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland Costituzionalismo e diversità etnica: il caso della Bosnia-Erzegovina (Constitutionalism and Ethnic Diversity: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina) Judicial Assistants in Europe – A Comparative Analysis Connected Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1