Rethinking of Participation in Workshop of Rural Planning

Taro Hirai
{"title":"Rethinking of Participation in Workshop of Rural Planning","authors":"Taro Hirai","doi":"10.2750/arp.39.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I explore some issues of participation in rural development through the action research in Aomori Prefecture. At first, by the review of works of rural planning and action researches on organizational and rural development, I clarify three issues on participation : 1) how can we arouse the ownership of stakeholders? especially, through arousing sense of crisis or appreciation of stakeholders? 2) how should be anybody included as participants? especially, should we simply adopt the famous rule of “putting the last first” ? 3) how can we manage the process of stakeholdersʼ participation adaptively? Secondly, I examine these three issues through the action research whose main material is the records of my own facilitation in more than 81 workshops of rural development projects in Aomori Prefecture s̓ 18 municipalities. As result, by the comparative analysis of main three or four municipalities ̓cases, I conclude on above-mentioned three issues : 1) for arousing the ownership of stakeholders, we should stimulate nor their sense of general crisis nor of self-appreciation but their sense of proper crisis pertained to their live concern. 2) for promoting the self-organizational participation, we should not put the last first simply and hastily but at first level the relationship between stakeholders and external experts towards sequential putting the inferior superior among stakeholders. 3) for managing the stakeholdersʼ participation adaptively, we should accept the transition of stakeholdersʼ concern and promote stakeholders including local government staff to share their consistent goal that we researchers should also promote them to put into words.","PeriodicalId":272722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2750/arp.39.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I explore some issues of participation in rural development through the action research in Aomori Prefecture. At first, by the review of works of rural planning and action researches on organizational and rural development, I clarify three issues on participation : 1) how can we arouse the ownership of stakeholders? especially, through arousing sense of crisis or appreciation of stakeholders? 2) how should be anybody included as participants? especially, should we simply adopt the famous rule of “putting the last first” ? 3) how can we manage the process of stakeholdersʼ participation adaptively? Secondly, I examine these three issues through the action research whose main material is the records of my own facilitation in more than 81 workshops of rural development projects in Aomori Prefecture s̓ 18 municipalities. As result, by the comparative analysis of main three or four municipalities ̓cases, I conclude on above-mentioned three issues : 1) for arousing the ownership of stakeholders, we should stimulate nor their sense of general crisis nor of self-appreciation but their sense of proper crisis pertained to their live concern. 2) for promoting the self-organizational participation, we should not put the last first simply and hastily but at first level the relationship between stakeholders and external experts towards sequential putting the inferior superior among stakeholders. 3) for managing the stakeholdersʼ participation adaptively, we should accept the transition of stakeholdersʼ concern and promote stakeholders including local government staff to share their consistent goal that we researchers should also promote them to put into words.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对参与农村规划研讨会的再思考
本文通过青森县的行动研究,探讨参与农村发展的一些问题。首先,通过对农村规划和组织与农村发展的行动研究工作的回顾,明确了参与的三个问题:1)如何激发利益相关者的所有权;特别是通过激发利益相关者的危机感或欣赏?2)如何将任何人纳入参与者?特别是,我们是否应该简单地采用著名的“把最后的放在第一位”的规则?3)如何对利益相关者参与过程进行适应性管理?其次,我通过行动研究来考察这三个问题,其主要材料是我自己在青森县18个市的81多个农村发展项目研讨会上的促进记录。因此,通过对主要三、四个城市案例的比较分析,笔者得出了上述三个问题:1)要激发利益相关者的所有权,我们不应该激发他们的一般危机感,也不应该激发他们的自我欣赏感,而应该激发他们对自己生活关注的适当危机感。2)为了促进自组织参与,我们不应该简单仓促地把后来者放在第一位,而应该把利益相关者与外部专家的关系放在第一位,朝着优先优先的顺序发展。3)为了对利益相关者的参与进行适应性管理,我们应该接受利益相关者关注的转变,促进包括地方政府工作人员在内的利益相关者分享他们一致的目标,我们研究人员也应该促进他们用语言表达出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Loose Preservation of Mingu: Challenge for Improving the Townscape by Residents DIY: Changes in Rooms and Instruments for Silkworm Rearing Fishing Equipment Made of Natural Materials: How to Read and Understand of Rural Landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1