Examining the Impact of Experiential Learning Activities on Student Performance in an Introductory Animal Science Course

James Scott, Eric Rubenstein, T. D. Pringle
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Experiential Learning Activities on Student Performance in an Introductory Animal Science Course","authors":"James Scott, Eric Rubenstein, T. D. Pringle","doi":"10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of experiential learning in agricultural courses within postsecondary institutions has become increasingly important as educators seek to provide students with a meaningful education that increases knowledge acquisition and achievement. Hands-on, experiential learning activities within agricultural sciences, and more directly animal sciences, have previously been used to provide students with experiences that increase performance in courses and overall development throughout a student’s education. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence that experiential learning laboratory lessons had on students enrolled in an introduction to animal science lecture course at [University]. Researchers utilized a quasi-experimental study, in which students were placed into one of three groups, depending on the experiential learning lessons that were taught throughout the semester. This was done to determine if students who participated in specific hands-on, experiential learning lessons retained more content knowledge than those who did not receive these lessons, on summative assessments given throughout the semester. Researchers utilized the first quiz scores to examine prior knowledge between groups, and determined that there was no difference. While researchers were unable to determine significance between groups and student content acquisition due to unequal group sizes, researchers determined that students who received experiential learning lessons performed better on average, than those who did not. Researchers identified recommendations for future studies, which include replicating the study with modifications, and repeating the study with two introductory courses simultaneously, in which one course entirely utilizes experiential learning lessons and the other course utilizes traditional review sessions. Additionally, researchers recommended practitioners integrate blending experiential learning opportunities and traditional lecture and review when teaching introductory courses.","PeriodicalId":421640,"journal":{"name":"NACTA Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of experiential learning in agricultural courses within postsecondary institutions has become increasingly important as educators seek to provide students with a meaningful education that increases knowledge acquisition and achievement. Hands-on, experiential learning activities within agricultural sciences, and more directly animal sciences, have previously been used to provide students with experiences that increase performance in courses and overall development throughout a student’s education. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence that experiential learning laboratory lessons had on students enrolled in an introduction to animal science lecture course at [University]. Researchers utilized a quasi-experimental study, in which students were placed into one of three groups, depending on the experiential learning lessons that were taught throughout the semester. This was done to determine if students who participated in specific hands-on, experiential learning lessons retained more content knowledge than those who did not receive these lessons, on summative assessments given throughout the semester. Researchers utilized the first quiz scores to examine prior knowledge between groups, and determined that there was no difference. While researchers were unable to determine significance between groups and student content acquisition due to unequal group sizes, researchers determined that students who received experiential learning lessons performed better on average, than those who did not. Researchers identified recommendations for future studies, which include replicating the study with modifications, and repeating the study with two introductory courses simultaneously, in which one course entirely utilizes experiential learning lessons and the other course utilizes traditional review sessions. Additionally, researchers recommended practitioners integrate blending experiential learning opportunities and traditional lecture and review when teaching introductory courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在动物科学入门课程中检验体验式学习活动对学生表现的影响
在高等教育机构的农业课程中使用体验式学习已经变得越来越重要,因为教育者试图为学生提供有意义的教育,以增加知识的获取和成就。在农业科学和更直接的动物科学中,动手体验式学习活动以前被用来为学生提供经验,提高他们在课程中的表现和在整个学生教育过程中的整体发展。因此,本研究的目的是检验体验式学习实验课程对[大学]动物科学导论讲座课程的学生的影响。研究人员利用了一项准实验研究,根据整个学期教授的体验式学习课程,将学生分为三组。在整个学期的总结性评估中,这样做是为了确定参加了具体的实践,体验式学习课程的学生是否比没有参加这些课程的学生保留了更多的内容知识。研究人员利用第一次测验的分数来检查两组之间的先验知识,并确定没有差异。虽然由于小组规模不等,研究人员无法确定小组和学生内容习得之间的意义,但研究人员确定,接受体验式学习课程的学生平均表现优于没有接受体验式学习课程的学生。研究人员确定了对未来研究的建议,包括修改重复研究,同时重复两门入门课程的研究,其中一门课程完全利用体验式学习课程,另一门课程利用传统的复习课程。此外,研究人员建议从业人员在教授入门课程时将体验式学习机会与传统的讲座和复习相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Students’ Decisions to Engage in International Education Opportunities Post-COVID Study Abroad Programs and Student Stress: An Animal Science Curriculum Case Study Cyberbiosecurity Workforce Preparation From Reel to Real: Practical Tips for Implementing Inductive Learning with Film Examining Student Perceptions of Engagement and Learning in a Flipped Introductory Agricultural Mechanics Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1