Unit Cost Expectations and Uncertainty: Firms' Perspectives on Inflation

Brent H. Meyer, Nicholas B. Parker, X. Sheng
{"title":"Unit Cost Expectations and Uncertainty: Firms' Perspectives on Inflation","authors":"Brent H. Meyer, Nicholas B. Parker, X. Sheng","doi":"10.29338/WP2021-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We rely on the Atlanta Fed’s Business Inflation Expectations survey to draw inference about firms’ inflation perceptions, expectations, and uncertainty through the lens of firms’ unit (marginal) costs. Using methods grounded in the survey literature, we find evidence that the concept of “aggregate inflation” as measured through price statistics like the consumer price index hold very little relevance for business decision makers. This lack of relevance manifests itself through experiments (including randomized controlled trials) that show how researchers word questions to elicit inflation expectations and perceptions significantly changes firms’ responses. Our results suggest firms have become rationally ignorant of the concept of inflation in a low-inflation environment. Instead, we find that unit (marginal) costs are the relevant lens with which to capture firms’ views on the nominal side of the economy. We then investigate both firm-level (micro) and aggregated (macro) probabilistic unit cost expectations. On a firm level, unit costs are an important determinant of firms’ price-setting behavior. Aggregating across firms’ beliefs, firms’ unit cost perceptions strongly comove with official aggregate price statistics, and, importantly, firms’ expectations for the nominal side of the economy have little in common with the “prices in general” expectations of households. Rather, firms’ aggregated beliefs strongly covary with the inflation expectations of professional forecasters and market participants. JEL classification: E31, E52","PeriodicalId":296984,"journal":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Papers","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29338/WP2021-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We rely on the Atlanta Fed’s Business Inflation Expectations survey to draw inference about firms’ inflation perceptions, expectations, and uncertainty through the lens of firms’ unit (marginal) costs. Using methods grounded in the survey literature, we find evidence that the concept of “aggregate inflation” as measured through price statistics like the consumer price index hold very little relevance for business decision makers. This lack of relevance manifests itself through experiments (including randomized controlled trials) that show how researchers word questions to elicit inflation expectations and perceptions significantly changes firms’ responses. Our results suggest firms have become rationally ignorant of the concept of inflation in a low-inflation environment. Instead, we find that unit (marginal) costs are the relevant lens with which to capture firms’ views on the nominal side of the economy. We then investigate both firm-level (micro) and aggregated (macro) probabilistic unit cost expectations. On a firm level, unit costs are an important determinant of firms’ price-setting behavior. Aggregating across firms’ beliefs, firms’ unit cost perceptions strongly comove with official aggregate price statistics, and, importantly, firms’ expectations for the nominal side of the economy have little in common with the “prices in general” expectations of households. Rather, firms’ aggregated beliefs strongly covary with the inflation expectations of professional forecasters and market participants. JEL classification: E31, E52
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单位成本预期与不确定性:企业对通胀的看法
我们依靠亚特兰大联邦储备银行的商业通胀预期调查,通过企业的单位(边际)成本来推断企业的通胀感知、预期和不确定性。使用基于调查文献的方法,我们发现有证据表明,通过消费者价格指数等价格统计数据衡量的“总通货膨胀”概念与商业决策者的相关性很小。这种相关性的缺乏通过实验(包括随机对照试验)表现出来,这些实验表明,研究人员如何用措辞来引出通胀预期和看法,会显著改变企业的反应。我们的研究结果表明,在低通胀环境下,企业已经变得理性地忽视了通胀的概念。相反,我们发现单位(边际)成本是捕捉企业对经济名义方面看法的相关镜头。然后,我们研究了企业层面(微观)和总体(宏观)的概率单位成本预期。在企业层面上,单位成本是企业定价行为的重要决定因素。综合公司的信念,公司的单位成本观念与官方的总价格统计数据非常一致,而且,重要的是,公司对经济名义方面的预期与家庭的“一般价格”预期几乎没有共同之处。相反,企业的总体信念与专业预测者和市场参与者的通胀预期高度一致。JEL分类:E31、E52
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taxes, Subsidies, and Gender Gaps in Hours and Wages The S-curve: Understanding the Dynamics of Worldwide Financial Liberalization Impact of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Labor Supply and Welfare of Married Households Estimating Occupation- and Location-Specific Wages over the Life Cycle Spoils of War: Trade Shocks and Segmented Labor Markets in Spain during WWI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1