Are platelet and eosinophil parameters indicators of predicting the development of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy?
I. Selvi, E. Öztürk
{"title":"Are platelet and eosinophil parameters indicators of predicting the development of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy?","authors":"I. Selvi, E. Öztürk","doi":"10.5505/AOT.2019.75436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction(ED) may develop in 14-90% following radical prostatectomy(RP). Development of ED is due to neurovascular damage during surgery. In our study, we aimed to evaluate whether the platelet and eosinophil parameters are prognostic factors in predicting ED after prostatectomy. METHODS: Data of 181 patients who underwent RP between January 2010 and December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. In the preoperative period, platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) and eosinophil count were recorded. The patients were evaluated for ED according to the International Erectile Function Index in preoperatively and postoperatively. In the postoperative 12th month, ED was observed in 128 patients following RP. Among them, 82 patients with postoperative ED were included in Group I, and 46 patients without postoperative ED were included in Group II. RESULTS: Age (p=0.281) and body mass index (p=0.851) had no significant difference between groups. In preoperative period, mean platelet count (292.18±51.62 vs. 240.15±46.25, p<0.001), mean MPV value (8.77±1.24 vs. 6.17±0.87, p<0.001) and mean eosinophil count (0.57±0.16 vs. 0.47±0.10, p<0.001) were higher Orijinal Çalışma 137 Adress for correspondence: İsmail Selvi, Karabük Üniversitesi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği 78200 Merkez / Karabük – Türkiye e-mail: ismselvi33@hotmail.com Available at www.actaoncologicaturcica.com Copyright ©Ankara Onkoloji Hastanesi in Group I. Mean PDW value (16.21±1.84 vs.16.75±1.77, p=0.110) had no significantly difference. According to ROC analysis, the cut-off values for platelet, MPV and eosinophil were 242 (AUC: 0.783, p<0.001), 7.24 (AUC: 0.951, p<0.001) and 0.5 (AUC: 0.675, p=0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, MPV and eosinophil were found to be more important independent factors in predicting ED after RP. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: It is shown that platelet, MPV and eosinophil are independent predictive factors in predicting ED following prostatectomy.","PeriodicalId":435847,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica Turcica","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica Turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/AOT.2019.75436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction(ED) may develop in 14-90% following radical prostatectomy(RP). Development of ED is due to neurovascular damage during surgery. In our study, we aimed to evaluate whether the platelet and eosinophil parameters are prognostic factors in predicting ED after prostatectomy. METHODS: Data of 181 patients who underwent RP between January 2010 and December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. In the preoperative period, platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) and eosinophil count were recorded. The patients were evaluated for ED according to the International Erectile Function Index in preoperatively and postoperatively. In the postoperative 12th month, ED was observed in 128 patients following RP. Among them, 82 patients with postoperative ED were included in Group I, and 46 patients without postoperative ED were included in Group II. RESULTS: Age (p=0.281) and body mass index (p=0.851) had no significant difference between groups. In preoperative period, mean platelet count (292.18±51.62 vs. 240.15±46.25, p<0.001), mean MPV value (8.77±1.24 vs. 6.17±0.87, p<0.001) and mean eosinophil count (0.57±0.16 vs. 0.47±0.10, p<0.001) were higher Orijinal Çalışma 137 Adress for correspondence: İsmail Selvi, Karabük Üniversitesi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği 78200 Merkez / Karabük – Türkiye e-mail: ismselvi33@hotmail.com Available at www.actaoncologicaturcica.com Copyright ©Ankara Onkoloji Hastanesi in Group I. Mean PDW value (16.21±1.84 vs.16.75±1.77, p=0.110) had no significantly difference. According to ROC analysis, the cut-off values for platelet, MPV and eosinophil were 242 (AUC: 0.783, p<0.001), 7.24 (AUC: 0.951, p<0.001) and 0.5 (AUC: 0.675, p=0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, MPV and eosinophil were found to be more important independent factors in predicting ED after RP. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: It is shown that platelet, MPV and eosinophil are independent predictive factors in predicting ED following prostatectomy.
血小板和嗜酸性粒细胞参数是预测根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的指标吗?
导言:14-90%的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后可能出现勃起功能障碍(ED)。ED的发展是由于手术过程中神经血管的损伤。在我们的研究中,我们旨在评估血小板和嗜酸性粒细胞参数是否是预测前列腺切除术后ED的预后因素。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年12月181例RP患者的资料。术前记录血小板计数、平均血小板体积(MPV)、血小板分布宽度(PDW)和嗜酸性粒细胞计数。术前和术后根据国际勃起功能指数对患者进行ED评价。术后12个月,128例RP患者出现ED。其中,有术后ED的患者82例作为第一组,无术后ED的患者46例作为第二组。结果:年龄(p=0.281)、体重指数(p=0.851)组间差异无统计学意义。术前平均血小板计数(292.18±51.62比240.15±46.25,p<0.001)、平均MPV值(8.77±1.24比6.17±0.87,p<0.001)、平均酸性粒细胞计数(0.57±0.16比0.47±0.10,p<0.001)较高。原始Çalışma 137通讯地址:İsmail Selvi, karab Üniversitesi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği 78200 Merkez / karab k - t rkiyeismselvi33@hotmail.com见www.actaoncologicaturcica.com版权©Ankara Onkoloji Hastanesi第一组平均PDW值(16.21±1.84 vs.16.75±1.77,p=0.110)无显著差异。根据ROC分析,血小板、MPV和嗜酸性粒细胞的截止值分别为242 (AUC: 0.783, p<0.001)、7.24 (AUC: 0.951, p<0.001)和0.5 (AUC: 0.675, p=0.001)。在多因素分析中,MPV和嗜酸性粒细胞是预测RP后ED更重要的独立因素。讨论与结论:血小板、MPV和嗜酸性粒细胞是预测前列腺切除术后ED的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。