The Received View and Its Rivals

Thomas J. Donahue-Ochoa
{"title":"The Received View and Its Rivals","authors":"Thomas J. Donahue-Ochoa","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190051686.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 considers the received view’s answers to the book’s final two questions, as well as the answers given by rival theories to all five of its questions. It begins by challenging three rival theories of the responsibility to combat injustice. These ground it in a duty of universal altruism or equity, in duties we acquire if we could at least potentially harm the injustice’s victims, or in the theory that oppression makes both the oppressed and the oppressor unfree, so that both have reason to abolish it. The chapter then challenges the received view’s theory that only the victim group are made unfree by oppression, as well as the theory saying that the unfree are the oppressor and the oppressed. It concludes by challenging theories holding that oppression’s ultimate harm is that it alienates or dehumanizes victims, constrains them from achieving their potential, or prevents them from living as free equals.","PeriodicalId":221809,"journal":{"name":"Unfreedom for All","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfreedom for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190051686.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 3 considers the received view’s answers to the book’s final two questions, as well as the answers given by rival theories to all five of its questions. It begins by challenging three rival theories of the responsibility to combat injustice. These ground it in a duty of universal altruism or equity, in duties we acquire if we could at least potentially harm the injustice’s victims, or in the theory that oppression makes both the oppressed and the oppressor unfree, so that both have reason to abolish it. The chapter then challenges the received view’s theory that only the victim group are made unfree by oppression, as well as the theory saying that the unfree are the oppressor and the oppressed. It concludes by challenging theories holding that oppression’s ultimate harm is that it alienates or dehumanizes victims, constrains them from achieving their potential, or prevents them from living as free equals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接收视图及其竞争对手
第3章考虑了对本书最后两个问题的公认观点的答案,以及对所有五个问题的竞争理论的答案。它首先挑战了对抗不公正责任的三种对立理论。这些都将其建立在普遍利他主义或公平的义务上,建立在我们至少可能潜在地伤害不公正的受害者时所获得的义务上,或者建立在压迫使被压迫者和压迫者都不自由的理论上,因此双方都有理由废除它。然后,这一章挑战了传统的观点,即只有受害者群体因压迫而不自由的理论,以及不自由的人是压迫者和被压迫者的理论。最后,它挑战了一些理论,这些理论认为,压迫的最终伤害是它疏远或使受害者失去人性,限制他们实现自己的潜力,或阻止他们自由平等地生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Global Racial Order How Injustices Harm You Systematic Injustice and the Scale of Wrong-doing The Diagnostics of Injustice Solidarity, Universal Unfreedom, and You
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1