The Birth of an Illiberal Informational Autocracy in Europe: A Case Study on Hungary

Péter Krekó
{"title":"The Birth of an Illiberal Informational Autocracy in Europe: A Case Study on Hungary","authors":"Péter Krekó","doi":"10.53483/wcjw3538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the institutional aspects of the illiberal shift in Hungary since 2010 have received notable scholarly attention, less analysis has dealt with the informational aspects of this de-democratization trend. In this article, I apply the concept of “informational autocracy” to Hungary to explain the way in which the Orbán government has been able to achieve the kind of hegemonic rule in that has also helped Orbán’s Fidesz party win their fourth straight election. The article briefly explains how the Hungarian media infrastructure (the “hardware”), was built up, and what are the dominant narratives⁠—especially the conspiracy theories⁠—that the regime is propagating (the “software”). The efficiency of Orbán’s informational autocracy in shaping public opinion is explained through specific cases in which the government could easily shore up its popularity by manipulating information, such as during the pandemic and after the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The article argues that Hungarian informational autocracy combines strategies and techniques that are imported from Western liberal democracies—with plenty of inspiration coming from the recent example of the United States, and with narratives and conspiracy theories that are imported from Eastern autocracies.","PeriodicalId":370884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Illiberalism Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Illiberalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53483/wcjw3538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While the institutional aspects of the illiberal shift in Hungary since 2010 have received notable scholarly attention, less analysis has dealt with the informational aspects of this de-democratization trend. In this article, I apply the concept of “informational autocracy” to Hungary to explain the way in which the Orbán government has been able to achieve the kind of hegemonic rule in that has also helped Orbán’s Fidesz party win their fourth straight election. The article briefly explains how the Hungarian media infrastructure (the “hardware”), was built up, and what are the dominant narratives⁠—especially the conspiracy theories⁠—that the regime is propagating (the “software”). The efficiency of Orbán’s informational autocracy in shaping public opinion is explained through specific cases in which the government could easily shore up its popularity by manipulating information, such as during the pandemic and after the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The article argues that Hungarian informational autocracy combines strategies and techniques that are imported from Western liberal democracies—with plenty of inspiration coming from the recent example of the United States, and with narratives and conspiracy theories that are imported from Eastern autocracies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲非自由信息专制的诞生:以匈牙利为例
虽然匈牙利自2010年以来的非自由主义转变的制度方面受到了显著的学术关注,但对这种去民主化趋势的信息方面的分析却很少。在本文中,我将“信息独裁”的概念应用于匈牙利,以解释Orbán政府能够实现霸权统治的方式,这也帮助Orbán的青民盟连续第四次赢得选举。这篇文章简要解释了匈牙利媒体基础设施(“硬件”)是如何建立起来的,以及政府正在传播的主流叙事(尤其是阴谋论)是什么(“软件”)。Orbán信息专制在塑造公众舆论方面的效率,可以通过一些具体案例来解释,在这些案例中,政府可以很容易地通过操纵信息来支撑自己的人气,比如在疫情期间和俄罗斯入侵乌克兰之后。这篇文章认为,匈牙利的信息独裁结合了从西方自由民主国家引进的策略和技术——从美国最近的例子中获得了大量灵感,以及从东方独裁国家引进的叙事和阴谋论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patriarch Kirill’s Praetorian Guard: Sorok Sorokov as Radical Outreach for “Holy Tradition” The Phantasmatic Dimension of Culture Wars: The Case of Social Conservatism Owning and Disowning the Female Body: Mediating Gender and the Conservative Values Clash in Kazakhstan Documents Accuse: The Post-Soviet Memory Politics of Genocide The Spanish and French Far Rights in Their Quest for a New Traditionalist Order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1