Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Writing Argumentative Essay

Erwin Oktoma, Muhammad Nugroho, Yayan Suryana, Z. Rafli, A. Rahmat
{"title":"Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Writing Argumentative Essay","authors":"Erwin Oktoma, Muhammad Nugroho, Yayan Suryana, Z. Rafli, A. Rahmat","doi":"10.4108/EAI.12-12-2020.2305011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This research examines to analyze and find out the students’ critical thinking ability in writing argumentative essay in sixth semester students The focus is to know the students’ level and also the way they apply the critical thinking ability in their argumentative writing. Based on the theory, there are six levels in critical thinking ability. Those are the unreflective, the challenge, beginning, practicing, advanced, and accomplished thinker. The researcher used qualitative as the design of the research. Data collection technique used in this research was questionnaire and documentation. The questionnaire was to know students’ ability in applying their critical thinking in writing argumentative essay. The documentation used to gain more information about students’ critical thinking ability and complete the information in the questionnaire. Based on the result of study, the students’ ability in applying critical thinking is 31% in advanced thinker and practicing thinker, 18% in beginning thinker, 12% in accomplished thinker, 6% in the challenge thinker, and 2% in unreflective thinker, and the students’ writing is 23% students in practicing and advanced thinker, 17% student in the challenge thinker, accomplished thinker and beginning thinker and 5% student in the unreflective thinker, and the last students’ achievement of critical thinking is 44% students in accomplished thinker, 47% students in advanced thinker, 5% students in beginning thinker, 2% students in practicing thinker, 1% students in the unreflective thinker, and 1% students in the challenge thinker. Their ability in critical thinking is supported by their ability which they have. Due to the students have applied the critical thinking well, they can enhance well the critical thinking ability in argumentative essay","PeriodicalId":198150,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st Universitas Kuningan International Conference on Social Science, Environment and Technology, UNiSET 2020, 12 December 2020, Kuningan, West Java, Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st Universitas Kuningan International Conference on Social Science, Environment and Technology, UNiSET 2020, 12 December 2020, Kuningan, West Java, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.12-12-2020.2305011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This research examines to analyze and find out the students’ critical thinking ability in writing argumentative essay in sixth semester students The focus is to know the students’ level and also the way they apply the critical thinking ability in their argumentative writing. Based on the theory, there are six levels in critical thinking ability. Those are the unreflective, the challenge, beginning, practicing, advanced, and accomplished thinker. The researcher used qualitative as the design of the research. Data collection technique used in this research was questionnaire and documentation. The questionnaire was to know students’ ability in applying their critical thinking in writing argumentative essay. The documentation used to gain more information about students’ critical thinking ability and complete the information in the questionnaire. Based on the result of study, the students’ ability in applying critical thinking is 31% in advanced thinker and practicing thinker, 18% in beginning thinker, 12% in accomplished thinker, 6% in the challenge thinker, and 2% in unreflective thinker, and the students’ writing is 23% students in practicing and advanced thinker, 17% student in the challenge thinker, accomplished thinker and beginning thinker and 5% student in the unreflective thinker, and the last students’ achievement of critical thinking is 44% students in accomplished thinker, 47% students in advanced thinker, 5% students in beginning thinker, 2% students in practicing thinker, 1% students in the unreflective thinker, and 1% students in the challenge thinker. Their ability in critical thinking is supported by their ability which they have. Due to the students have applied the critical thinking well, they can enhance well the critical thinking ability in argumentative essay
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生议论文写作中的批判性思维能力
. 本研究旨在分析和发现六学期学生议论文写作中的批判性思维能力,重点是了解学生的水平以及他们在议论文写作中运用批判性思维能力的方式。根据该理论,批判性思维能力分为六个层次。这些人是不反思的,挑战的,开始的,实践的,高级的和有成就的思想家。研究者采用定性方法作为研究的设计。本研究采用问卷调查法和文献法收集资料。问卷的目的是了解学生在议论文写作中运用批判性思维的能力。该文件用于获得更多关于学生批判性思维能力的信息,并完成问卷中的信息。根据研究结果,学生运用批判性思维的能力在高级思考者和实践思考者中占31%,在初级思考者中占18%,在完成思考者中占12%,在挑战思考者中占6%,在非反思思考者中占2%,学生的写作在实践思考者和高级思考者中占23%,在挑战思考者中占17%,在完成思考者中占17%,在非反思思考者中占5%。最后一个学生的批判性思维成绩为:44%的学生为完成型思考者,47%的学生为高级思考者,5%的学生为初学者,2%的学生为实践型思考者,1%的学生为非反思型思考者,1%的学生为挑战型思考者。他们的批判性思维能力是由他们的能力所支持的。由于学生很好地运用了批判性思维,他们在议论文中可以很好地提高批判性思维能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Training Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and the Ability to Design Experiments through the Inquiry Lab Batik Tulis Paseban in Visual Perspective Taboo and Euphemism in Kuningan as Local Wisdom to Support Literation The Effect of the Application of the Cooperative Learning Model Type: Team Games Tournament on Student Learning Outcomes in Economic Subject Post method Era Pedagogy: Maximizing EFL online Teaching Practice through video viewing at Higher Education in the Context of Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1