Using Link Prediction to Estimate the Collaborative Influence of Researchers

Evelyn Perez Cervantes, J. Mena-Chalco, Maria Cristina Ferreira de Oliveira, R. M. C. Junior
{"title":"Using Link Prediction to Estimate the Collaborative Influence of Researchers","authors":"Evelyn Perez Cervantes, J. Mena-Chalco, Maria Cristina Ferreira de Oliveira, R. M. C. Junior","doi":"10.1109/eScience.2013.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of a particular individual in a scientific collaboration network could be measured in several ways. Estimating influence commonly requires calculating computationally costly global measures, which may be impractical on networks with hundreds of thousands of vertices. In this paper, we introduce new local measures to estimate the collaborative influence of individual researchers in a collaboration network. Our approach is based on the link prediction technique, and its underlying rationale is to assess how the presence/absence of a researcher affects the link prediction outcome in the network as a whole. It is natural to assume that the absence of a researcher with strong influence in the network will cause negative impact in the correct link prediction. Scientists are represented as vertices in the collaboration graph, and a vertex removal and corresponding link prediction process are performed iteratively for all vertices, each vertex being handled independently. The SVM supervised learning model has been adopted as link predictor. The proposed approach has been tested on real collaboration networks relative to multiple time periods, processing the networks in order to assign more relevance to recent than to older collaborations. The experimental tests suggest that our measure of impact on link prediction has high negative correlation with standard vertex importance measures such as between ness and closeness centrality.","PeriodicalId":325272,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Science","volume":"1997 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2013.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The influence of a particular individual in a scientific collaboration network could be measured in several ways. Estimating influence commonly requires calculating computationally costly global measures, which may be impractical on networks with hundreds of thousands of vertices. In this paper, we introduce new local measures to estimate the collaborative influence of individual researchers in a collaboration network. Our approach is based on the link prediction technique, and its underlying rationale is to assess how the presence/absence of a researcher affects the link prediction outcome in the network as a whole. It is natural to assume that the absence of a researcher with strong influence in the network will cause negative impact in the correct link prediction. Scientists are represented as vertices in the collaboration graph, and a vertex removal and corresponding link prediction process are performed iteratively for all vertices, each vertex being handled independently. The SVM supervised learning model has been adopted as link predictor. The proposed approach has been tested on real collaboration networks relative to multiple time periods, processing the networks in order to assign more relevance to recent than to older collaborations. The experimental tests suggest that our measure of impact on link prediction has high negative correlation with standard vertex importance measures such as between ness and closeness centrality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用链接预测估计研究人员的协作影响
一个特定个体在科学合作网络中的影响力可以用几种方法来衡量。估计影响通常需要计算计算成本很高的全局度量,这在具有数十万个顶点的网络上可能是不切实际的。在本文中,我们引入了新的局部度量来估计协作网络中单个研究人员的协作影响。我们的方法基于链接预测技术,其基本原理是评估研究人员的存在/不存在如何影响整个网络中的链接预测结果。人们很自然地认为,如果没有一个在网络中具有较强影响力的研究者,会对正确的链路预测产生负面影响。将科学家表示为协作图中的顶点,并对所有顶点迭代执行顶点移除和相应的链接预测过程,每个顶点独立处理。采用支持向量机监督学习模型作为链路预测器。所提出的方法已经在多个时间段的真实协作网络上进行了测试,对网络进行处理,以便为最近的协作分配更多的相关性,而不是旧的协作。实验测试表明,我们对链接预测的影响度量与标准顶点重要性度量(如关联度和密切度中心性)具有高度负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Derived Access Rights in the Social Cloud Accelerating In-memory Cross Match of Astronomical Catalogs Scientific Analysis by Queries in Extended SPARQL over a Scalable e-Science Data Store Malleable Access Rights to Establish and Enable Scientific Collaboration An Autonomous Security Storage Solution for Data-Intensive Cooperative Cloud Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1