Comparing the dynamic behavior between LFSRs and counting techniques

R. Seireg, A. Vacroux
{"title":"Comparing the dynamic behavior between LFSRs and counting techniques","authors":"R. Seireg, A. Vacroux","doi":"10.1109/NRSC.1996.551425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transition counting is one of the schemes which is used for testing digital circuits. A relation for the aliasing error probability has been deduced which depends on the length of the input pattern. Previously, we have proved that the final value for aliasing error probability for both linear and counting techniques are similar. However, the practical results indicate that the linear technique has a better performance than the counting technique. We study the dynamic behavior for the counting technique. The results are discussed and compared with the results obtained from the linear technique which supports the empirical and practical conclusions for the superiority of the LFSR.","PeriodicalId":127585,"journal":{"name":"Thirteenth National Radio Science Conference. NRSC '96","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thirteenth National Radio Science Conference. NRSC '96","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NRSC.1996.551425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transition counting is one of the schemes which is used for testing digital circuits. A relation for the aliasing error probability has been deduced which depends on the length of the input pattern. Previously, we have proved that the final value for aliasing error probability for both linear and counting techniques are similar. However, the practical results indicate that the linear technique has a better performance than the counting technique. We study the dynamic behavior for the counting technique. The results are discussed and compared with the results obtained from the linear technique which supports the empirical and practical conclusions for the superiority of the LFSR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较lfsr和计数技术的动态行为
跃迁计数是测试数字电路的一种方法。推导了混叠误差概率与输入模式长度的关系。以前,我们已经证明了线性技术和计数技术的混叠误差概率的最终值是相似的。然而,实际结果表明,线性技术比计数技术具有更好的性能。我们研究了计数技术的动态行为。将所得结果与线性方法所得结果进行了讨论和比较,支持了LFSR优越性的经验和实践结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the parametric Gaussian classifier using neural networks RLS solution for the adaptive recursive filter Time-dependence of backscattered intensities of a sphere illuminated with very short electromagnetic pulses Prediction model selection for compression of satellite images A simple invariant neural network for 2-D image recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1