A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Network Intrusion Detection System

P. Bhatt, Priyanka Dahiya
{"title":"A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Network Intrusion Detection System","authors":"P. Bhatt, Priyanka Dahiya","doi":"10.56025/ijaresm.2022.10522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this paper is to assess and detect intrusions, which is one of the most complicated tasks due to the increasing diversity of attacks. As advanced breaches grow increasingly, it will become more difficult to detect them in various industries, such as industry and national security. Traditional intrusion detection methods are no longer capable of detecting malicious behaviour that follows unusual patterns. CSE-CICIDS2018 dataset is a popular dataset used for testing intrusion detection systems (IDS). This research was intended to develop predictive models for network-based intrusion detection. That is the latest intrusion detection dataset, which is huge data, open source, and covers a broad spectrum of attack patterns. This research uses two machine-learning-based algorithms, the Random Forest and Decision Tree algorithms, to focus on training and testing accuracy of the dataset. This paper finds out that the Random Forest provides the highest 99% accuracy as compared to the Decision Tree.","PeriodicalId":365321,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of All Research Education & Scientific Methods","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of All Research Education & Scientific Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56025/ijaresm.2022.10522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to assess and detect intrusions, which is one of the most complicated tasks due to the increasing diversity of attacks. As advanced breaches grow increasingly, it will become more difficult to detect them in various industries, such as industry and national security. Traditional intrusion detection methods are no longer capable of detecting malicious behaviour that follows unusual patterns. CSE-CICIDS2018 dataset is a popular dataset used for testing intrusion detection systems (IDS). This research was intended to develop predictive models for network-based intrusion detection. That is the latest intrusion detection dataset, which is huge data, open source, and covers a broad spectrum of attack patterns. This research uses two machine-learning-based algorithms, the Random Forest and Decision Tree algorithms, to focus on training and testing accuracy of the dataset. This paper finds out that the Random Forest provides the highest 99% accuracy as compared to the Decision Tree.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络入侵检测系统中机器学习分类器的比较
本文的主要目标是评估和检测入侵,由于攻击的多样性日益增加,这是最复杂的任务之一。随着先进的漏洞越来越多,在工业和国家安全等各个行业中发现它们将变得越来越困难。传统的入侵检测方法已无法检测出遵循异常模式的恶意行为。CSE-CICIDS2018数据集是用于测试入侵检测系统(IDS)的流行数据集。本研究旨在建立基于网络的入侵检测预测模型。这是最新的入侵检测数据集,它是一个巨大的数据,开源的,涵盖了广泛的攻击模式。本研究使用两种基于机器学习的算法,随机森林和决策树算法,专注于训练和测试数据集的准确性。本文发现,与决策树相比,随机森林提供了最高的99%的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traffic Light Controller System for Emergency Vehicles using Internet of Things Assessment of Prevalent Risk Factors and Warning Signs and Symptoms among Myocardial Infarction Patients Attending Cardiology Department, Skims Forensic Sketch Reconnaissance Using Deep Learning Solubility Enhancement of Piroxicam Using Co-Crystallization Technique The therapeutic potential of cuscuta chinensis lam: A Systematic Review Type of article: Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1