Counterfactual Interlocutors

N. Ballantyne
{"title":"Counterfactual Interlocutors","authors":"N. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the intellectual world were different, we would very likely face powerful objections we haven’t actually encountered. Realizing that “counterfactual interlocutors” could devise objections to our strongest arguments can help us keep our confidence in check. This chapter defends the idea that counterfactual interlocutors may challenge our controversial opinions.","PeriodicalId":345622,"journal":{"name":"Knowing Our Limits","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowing Our Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If the intellectual world were different, we would very likely face powerful objections we haven’t actually encountered. Realizing that “counterfactual interlocutors” could devise objections to our strongest arguments can help us keep our confidence in check. This chapter defends the idea that counterfactual interlocutors may challenge our controversial opinions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反事实的对话者
如果知识界是不同的,我们很可能会面临我们实际上没有遇到过的强大反对意见。意识到“反事实对话者”可以设计出反对我们最有力论点的方案,可以帮助我们控制自己的信心。本章为反事实对话者可能挑战我们有争议的观点这一观点进行辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do Epistemic Principles Guide? Regulative Epistemology in the Seventeenth Century How to Know Our Limits The End of Inquiry Disagreement and Debunking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1