Effects of Different Types of Incubators on Embryo Development and Clinical Outcomes

Ji Liu, Yanhua Zhou, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Lingkun Tong, Yan-hong Li, Ling Liu, Zhiyan Xu, Honghui Wang
{"title":"Effects of Different Types of Incubators on Embryo Development and Clinical Outcomes","authors":"Ji Liu, Yanhua Zhou, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Lingkun Tong, Yan-hong Li, Ling Liu, Zhiyan Xu, Honghui Wang","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-122464/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Main differences of incubators are humidity, temperature and gas control ways, which play important roles in regulating the steady state of culture media. In this study, we compared the effects of different types of incubators (air jacket incubators and water jacket incubators) on embryo development and clinical outcomes in human assisted reproduction. We found that temperature recovery time in air jacket incubators was significantly shorter than that in water jacket incubators. Although the O2 recovering time was also significantly shorter in air jacket incubators as compared with the water jacket incubator, no significant differences were observed in CO2 recovering time between two groups, which was also verified by pH recovering time of culture media. Besides, the temperature of culture medium in the dish covered with oil recovered more quickly in the air jacket incubators. However, there were no significant differences observed in the fertilization rate, Day 3 high-quality embryo rate, blastocyst rate, good blastocyst rate and clinical outcomes between two groups. These results indicate that the microenvironment, especially the temperature, in air jacket incubator recover faster than that in water jacket incubators, however, there were no significant differences in embryo development and clinical outcomes between two types of incubators.","PeriodicalId":415770,"journal":{"name":"Infertility and Assisted Reproduction [Working Title]","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infertility and Assisted Reproduction [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-122464/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Main differences of incubators are humidity, temperature and gas control ways, which play important roles in regulating the steady state of culture media. In this study, we compared the effects of different types of incubators (air jacket incubators and water jacket incubators) on embryo development and clinical outcomes in human assisted reproduction. We found that temperature recovery time in air jacket incubators was significantly shorter than that in water jacket incubators. Although the O2 recovering time was also significantly shorter in air jacket incubators as compared with the water jacket incubator, no significant differences were observed in CO2 recovering time between two groups, which was also verified by pH recovering time of culture media. Besides, the temperature of culture medium in the dish covered with oil recovered more quickly in the air jacket incubators. However, there were no significant differences observed in the fertilization rate, Day 3 high-quality embryo rate, blastocyst rate, good blastocyst rate and clinical outcomes between two groups. These results indicate that the microenvironment, especially the temperature, in air jacket incubator recover faster than that in water jacket incubators, however, there were no significant differences in embryo development and clinical outcomes between two types of incubators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同类型培养箱对胚胎发育及临床结局的影响
培养箱的主要区别在于湿度、温度和气体控制方式,它们对调节培养基的稳态起着重要的作用。在本研究中,我们比较了不同类型的孵化器(气套孵化器和水套孵化器)对人类辅助生殖中胚胎发育和临床结果的影响。我们发现空气套培养箱的温度恢复时间明显短于水套培养箱。虽然气套培养箱中O2的恢复时间也明显短于水套培养箱,但两组间CO2的恢复时间无显著差异,培养基pH恢复时间也证实了这一点。此外,在空气套培养箱中,有油的培养皿中的培养基温度恢复得更快。但两组在受精率、第3天优质胚率、囊胚率、良好囊胚率及临床结局方面均无显著差异。结果表明,空气套培养箱内的微环境,尤其是温度的恢复速度要快于水套培养箱内,但两种培养箱内的胚胎发育和临床结果无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Heavy Metals on Tyrosine Kinases Signaling during Sperm Capacitation Understanding Male Infertility for Promising ART You Have a New Super Power: Ethics of oocyte Cryopreservation Fibroids and Infertility Efficiency of Autologous Egg Cryopreservation: Eight Years’ Experiences and Clinical Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1